Just tested it out and www.surveymonkey.com should have an option that works for you. I just figured it all out so there may be some tinkering you want to do but to help you out this is how I set things up:I know many of you would like to be able to rank several games each year and so would I. Does anybody know of a poll creation site where say 3-4 options can be ranked and scored from a larger list and results can be shown immediately to participants? The forum poll does allow for multiple votes but no ranking. I’ve not been able find anything suitable and ultimately it’s just for fun so it doesn’t make sense to put too much effort into it.
Thank you. With weighted averages I guess it's only possible to have a score range of 1 to 3 or similar?Just tested it out and www.surveymonkey.com should have an option that works for you. I just figured it all out so there may be some tinkering you want to do but to help you out this is how I set things up:
And under Analyze Results click Customize and change this:
This is what the survey looks like: Best Games of 1995
And you can provide a link that people can go to afterwards to check the results: Best Games of 1995
I just did top three. You can have people rank however many you want. If you look in the second image that's where I have the columns labeled First, Second, and Third Place. Just add more columns for however many you want people to be able to rank.Thank you. With weighted averages I guess it's only possible to have a score range of 1 to 3 or similar?
Right, I meant that at the result screen the lowest score a game can have is 1 and the highest score is 3, no matter how many votes it gets (as far as I understand). The games would still be ranked in the correct order, but it does feel confusing.I just did top three. You can have people rank however many you want. If you look in the second image that's where I have the columns labeled First, Second, and Third Place. Just add more columns for however many you want people to be able to rank.
Also, I don't show it in the images but there's a spot (I believe Options in the first image) that you can set something to require people use all rankings you have set (so if there's five they must pick something for all five) or allow them to freely decide to rank any of them and still submit (so someone could rank a second place and third place and leave the rest all blank if they wanted).
There's essentially options to do anything you want. Just make sure that you weight first place to the highest value and the last rank to the lowest value or you'll get opposite results.
Yeah, though I guess I do see the problem and I'm seeing if I can find an option to make it work correctly. I guess how I thought it would work is that it would total up all the weighted scores and divide by participants. But it doesn't seem to do that. Instead if something isn't in the top three it doesn't get a score of zero, it just acts like it isn't part of the average. So a game getting a score of 3 by being picked as first place by a single person and then being ignored by everyone means it would end with a perfect score of 3 when instead it should be 3/Number of Participants. If 12 people did the survey it should be 0.25.Right, I meant that at the result screen the lowest score a game can have is 1 and the highest score is 3, no matter how many votes it gets (as far as I understand). The games would still be ranked in the correct order, but it does feel confusing.
Thank you for the effort. I'm not quite sold on the system yet but I'll keep it in mind.Bonfires Down It's not elegant and requires a bit of an honor system but the only way I can get the scoring to work properly is to create one additional column for "Not Ranked" and turn off the option saying for "Forced ranking (one answer per column)". It does mean someone could rank multiple games (or all!) as First Place but if we trust everyone would follow the rules you could do that to have them mark first, second, and third, and the rest all in the Not Ranked column which would have a weight of zero. That way every single row gets a score (0-3) from every participant and so when it does the average it pulls from total participants instead of just from the amount that selected it as a first, second, or third ranked option.
I'll probably do a Year of the Decade poll once we get there.Once this is finished we should vote for the best year in gaming. I think this one is a strong contender tbh.
Now that is a commendable pick. I am not a samsho fan but 2 is def. Well regarded among the classic fg games.Samurai Shodown 2