Yeah, the half-assed nature of the settings being split between the baby settings Win 10 UX and the grown-up Win 7 dialogs is still baffling to me.
I'm not the most anti-EGS of gamers (never bought something though) but it really makes you think. What a spectacularly moronic strategy and management. The last 2-3 years have proven without a doubt that Steam isn't really impacted by this shit, and yet they try, again and again, without doing the mininum on the side for their service to be more palatable.Epic only wants to keep those games out of Steam for the first year and see if they can hurt it, that's it, they don't care if you buy it or now, whatever Epic paid for KH exceeded the amount of copies it will probably sell at that price.
You can't be faulted for being sceptical at this stage but if Bloodborne and God of War make the jump after Horizon, how weird would it be for Spider-Man ?I severely doubt that it's true
A port not released on Steam makes a side effect elsewhere, it's a whole catalog of potential variables.I'm not the most anti-EGS of gamers (never bought something though) but it really makes you think. What a spectacularly moronic strategy and management. The last 2-3 years have proven without a doubt that Steam isn't really impacted by this shit, and yet they try, again and again, without doing the mininum on the side for their service to be more palatable.
Huge ports are coming to Steam left and right, they break their user records every other days and new hits that no one saw coming appear on the regular.
...
And Epic buys Kingdom Hearts exclusivity. This ain't enough, it boggles the mind that they could think 'this time, it will totally work'.
I don't see young people who like free stuff easily transforming into customers willing to pay 60$ for an old franchise they have never heard about.You're completely right. But Epic is playing a long term capitalistic game here, which has worked out for some other companies using a similar strategy like Amazon. Time will tell if EGS succeeds or not. Many young people love Epic because of Fortnite and the free games.
Yeah, I'm really worried that Windows is just headed for the wall. At the same time, I'm grumpy and sleep deprived, so who knows what might happen.The "Settings" app is an utter atrocity, and I haven't found anything to really fix that. StartIsBack at least fixes the start menu part though (including the borked search result prioritization).
Yeah I'm increasingly convinced that there is no adult in the room at Epic. This has always looked like a weird ego project and now they're on a path they can't easily get off of now. The funny thing about all of this, they could have stuck to their basic competitive differences to other stores, spent time and money on making a decent service ... and instead had a nice, profitable, competitive storefront that people had no problem using at this point.I'm not the most anti-EGS of gamers (never bought something though) but it really makes you think. What a spectacularly moronic strategy and management. The last 2-3 years have proven without a doubt that Steam isn't really impacted by this shit, and yet they try, again and again, without doing the mininum on the side for their service to be more palatable.
Huge ports are coming to Steam left and right, they break their user records every other days and new hits that no one saw coming appear on the regular.
...
And Epic buys Kingdom Hearts exclusivity. This ain't enough, it boggles the mind that they could think 'this time, it will totally work'.
Nioh 1 had awful connection issues and Koei probably wanted something more stable for 2 so they used EOS.Huh, didn't know that Nioh 2 maybe (?) uses Epic Online Services? There is an EOSSDK-Win64-Shipping.dll and it won't start without it.
Do people not find that Ubuntu or whatever will basically do what you need it to? I know it has some issues, but I've found it to be a nice alternative.Yes it’s a nice thought and would be nice to see someone else gaining market in OS area but I will most prob be nursing home before that happens. Microsoft has been there since the 90s and keeps on going for some reason.
Life is too short and need to use what we have at the moment to try finish the Steam backlog.
Would NMH even get a PC rating if it was streaming only?How weird, NMH2 is not included and Luna is still closed beta, what a weird thing to see.
(we don't know if it's exclusive or what)
No, don't think so but as I haven't seen previous Luna ratings, I don't know how they work.Would NMH even get a PC rating if it was streaming only?
Coco approved post.Kiryu is the best. If you don't agree, you are factually wrong.
That is all.
Yes but Ichiban is number 1.Kiryu is the best. If you don't agree, you are factually wrong.
That is all.
No looks dumb. Bad game. don't show me that. I woke up three times last night seeing conveyor belts in my sleep.This could be fun.
Captain of Industry - management game for PC
Captain of Industry is an upcoming construction and management simulation game for PC.www.captain-of-industry.com
Funny way to write IchibanKiryu is the best. If you don't agree, you are factually wrong.
That is all.
Note that this is a feature test. Like a good feature test it tests that particular feature -- and little else -- so you shouldn't expect those gains to translate to actual games when they start using mesh shaders.Number go big = Big good
Yup. No money.Anyone else who can't buy anything?
Steam is acting funny today, yeah.Anyone else who can't buy anything?
I think enemies are going to be in the game. Can't say if its 100% accurate just seen people saying they would be.Dyson Sphere really seems to need some kind of external threat, an enemy of some sort. The only way I know what to do next is by climbing up the research trees and trying to figure out what to make from there. I don't at any point feel like I need to build a massive energy generating dyson sphere for some reason. The game really lets you get comfortable, which I both like and find unmotivating.
I haven't played Factorio so can't compare but I strongly disagree here. The devs have mentioned they plan to add hostiles at some point and I hope it's optional because I would stop playing instantly and never come back. It's very nice to just build, plan, sort, structure, explore, plan, build, etc. my way towards this goal. The goal itself (build Dyson Sphere) doesn't change with the addition of threats, that just changes the micro management and ability to space out or spend time experimenting when you don't know if something will pan out. I don't need that tedium added to a game that already has so many things to constantly go renovate (veins get depleted so you have to go find new sources or reroute conveyers, or you suddenly have a much higher demand for a material you'd previously only automated one assembler for)Dyson Sphere really seems to need some kind of external threat, an enemy of some sort. The only way I know what to do next is by climbing up the research trees and trying to figure out what to make from there. I don't at any point feel like I need to build a massive energy generating dyson sphere for some reason. The game really lets you get comfortable, which I both like and find unmotivating.
The Witcher 3 came out in May 2015...it'll be six years soon.The power of PC: Witcher 3, a 4 year old game is the 2nd global best seller.
well shitThe Witcher 3 came out in May 2015...it'll be six years soon.
Yeah I can understand that. I'm on the fence myself about it and have mixed feelings about the enemies in Factorio also. Often I would just turn them off. Anyway in Dyson lots of the research is unintuitive when you get off the main path. Like I keep getting notifications that I'm just killing the research queue, but I don't feel like it's an accomplishment or like I did it for any reason. I'm just filling out the tree. I don't know why we're building the sphere, so the research part feels unfocused. Whereas if I had a smaller, shorter range goal like planetary defense and that's why I need all that titanium it would lead the way to why we need a dyson sphere.I haven't played Factorio so can't compare but I strongly disagree here. The devs have mentioned they plan to add hostiles at some point and I hope it's optional because I would stop playing instantly and never come back. It's very nice to just build, plan, sort, structure, explore, plan, build, etc. my way towards this goal. The goal itself (build Dyson Sphere) doesn't change with the addition of threats, that just changes the micro management and ability to space out or spend time experimenting when you don't know if something will pan out. I don't need that tedium added to a game that already has so many things to constantly go renovate (veins get depleted so you have to go find new sources or reroute conveyers, or you suddenly have a much higher demand for a material you'd previously only automated one assembler for)
Who knows, maybe 2021 is finally the year of the Linux desktop!I wish there was a proper third OS vendor to kick MS's butt and try to make something good.
Linux isn't that bad, but the unified and cohesive vision is to be found at the file and configuration level, inside the kernel, far from any UX considerations. That's why I stick to windows for now, but Linux remains at its core a better OS from a functional perspective. Just not from a user point of a view. UI and UX need tons of polish and a proper direction to start with.Who knows, maybe 2021 is finally the year of the Linux desktop!