I read somewhere that they'll start talking about it in mid January after the holiday break.When will we know the remedies ?
I read somewhere that they'll start talking about it in mid January after the holiday break.When will we know the remedies ?
I had to check it but didn't apple have a special deal with Amazon (Prime video), wouldn't that be the same, tho?2) They had a secret deal with Spotify where they would effectively pay a 0% commission.
The difference is I think Google signed sweetheart deals with app and game developers that ultimately led to a competing store not being created.I had to check it but didn't apple have a special deal with Amazon (Prime video), wouldn't that be the same, tho?
I mean, Apple were operating within the law.It is kinda fucked up though that the completely locked down ecosystem (Apple) won its court case so handily. EU to the rescue please.
That’s a nice brief summary of Google being utter bastards.Don't be evil - Wikiwand
"Don't be evil" is Google's former motto, and a phrase used in Google's corporate code of conduct.www.wikiwand.com
Pretty much. It's why most of us said from the start that Epic should have pursued its strategy against Apple through lobbying for legislative change instead of going through the court system.I mean, Apple were operating within the law.
You can disagree with how they’ve done it (and I do) but as the law stands: it’s Apple’s platform, and their rules apply.
Epic’s case against Apple was flimsy, and it was apparent Epic acted in completely bad faith when dealing with them.
And it’s as you’ve stated, a change in the law is needed to force Apple to open up.
Meanwhile, Google created an open platform because it was convenient for them at the start, and has since worked tirelessly to undermine it and fuck it up.
What Google did with Android is basically their MO across all their products and services. Create an attractive platform then enshittify it to extract rent.
I didn’t think Epic would win this hard, but they sure as shit had a strong case against Google, who have a storied history of treating the law as optional.
Eh. Epic will get fucked eventually.I absolutely hate that I am happy one of the biggest shits got a win against the worst shit companies. Makes me feel icky
I absolutely hate that I am happy one of the biggest shits got a win against the worst shit companies. Makes me feel icky
But we’ve gotten so much traction with Fortnite in so many different ways, and with the Epic Games Store, right, we’re going to continue investing heavily here. The Epic Games Store is the untold success story in the background. Since it launched in 2018, we now have 80 million monthly active users. Steam has 120 million, so we’re catching them fast! Fortnite has more concurrent users right now than all Steam games combined. You should really expect dramatic changes that benefit all developers over the next few years.
Ohhh...[Editor’s note: Sweeney isn’t right about Fortnite having more concurrent users than Steam. Epic spokesperson Natalie Muñoz confirmed Sweeney misinterpreted a Polygon story about how Fortnite hit 7.6 million players at a time when the entirety of Steam had 10.1 million. These days, Steam generally peaks at over 30 million, with valleys of 20 million. Fortnite’s valleys are closer to 3.8 million.]
Maybe you shouldn't have fired so many people.Why is Fortnite still not playable on Steam Deck?
If we only had a few more programmers. It’s the Linux problem. I love the Steam Deck hardware. Valve has done an amazing job there; I wish they would get to tens of millions of users, at which point it would actually make sense to support it.
What was the last major exclusive that was announced?In October 2019, Epic internally said it might pursue an aggressive pursuit model with the Epic Games Store, where it would aggressively pay more for exclusive games and really pull in more and more users. Are you in the aggressive pursuit model?
No, we’re in a different model, which is called the “Ridiculously aggressive pursuit model.” If it’s a 10-slide deck, that’s on slide 11.
No wonder he gets along so well with Elon.Besides all the obvious bullshit he spouted, Tim Sweeney always comes off as such a huge dork when speaking publicly. He's trying so hard to sound funny and cool but he always lands straight into cringe territory.
But we’ve gotten so much traction with Fortnite in so many different ways, and with the Epic Games Store, right, we’re going to continue investing heavily here. The Epic Games Store is the untold success story in the background. Since it launched in 2018, we now have 80 million monthly active users. Steam has 120 million, so we’re catching them fast! Fortnite has more concurrent users right now than all Steam games combined. You should really expect dramatic changes that benefit all developers over the next few years.
Why are you lying timmy timmy, the store is not in any shape near this state lmaoIn October 2019, Epic internally said it might pursue an aggressive pursuit model with the Epic Games Store, where it would aggressively pay more for exclusive games and really pull in more and more users. Are you in the aggressive pursuit model?
No, we’re in a different model, which is called the “Ridiculously aggressive pursuit model.” If it’s a 10-slide deck, that’s on slide 11.
Epic Games CEO: Apple Is Next after Google; We'll Put Fortnite on Any Store (Including Steam) Without 30% Fee
Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney promised to continue his fight against Apple. He also said he'd put Fortnite on Steam if it lowered the 30% fee.wccftech.com
fortnite coming to itch and winstore any day now
We’ll compete, and we’ll also put Fortnite on any serious store that gives all developers an awesome deal. Steam, Microsoft, OneStore, anyone: give all developers an awesome deal and we’ll support you. The end of these ridiculous 30% fees is near.
I'm old enough to remember when he said that UWP were a bad thing (he wasn't wrong but that's beside the point) and while technically you can put win32 apps now, I'd find him going there funny he won't why would he give money to anyone if he can avoid it.The Windows store has had a 12% cut for nearly three years. Why aren't you there?
In the interview, Sweeney says "Fortnite has more concurrent users right now than all Steam games combined. "Props to The Verge for correcting Sweeney's BS. (Also comparing a PC only platform to a game that is available on 6 platforms is disingenuous).
I'm using this from this day forward.
No physical release was boneheaded. The death of physical media has been overstated, especially for single player games. I know in the UK a game like Final Fantasy XVI had nearly 60% of its sales on physical.So you're telling me that publishing requires more than throwing a big fat check ?
You can track Fortnite's player numbers here. The game fluctuates between 4-7.5 million peak CCU ever since season OG happened. I'll give Epic props for reviving Fortnite as you can see it was in a bad place earlier in the year.In the interview, Sweeney says "Fortnite has more concurrent users right now than all Steam games combined. "
He did not say "more concurrent users than all users online on steam combined".
Fortnite's number is probably not higher than steam's "people in game" number, given that there are 8 million people in-game on steam right now, but that editor's note they added is disproving something he did not say.
Fortnite's 7.6 million is definitely nothing to scoff at. Even if I will personally scoff because I dislike MP games and wish this kind of success to some other games entirely
The second video. That is all.
The second video. That is all.
The second video. That is all.
Corie Wright, Vice President of Public Policy at Epic Games said: The State Attorneys General settled with Google before trial to get a one-time payout with no true relief for consumers or developers. After originally seeking $10.5 billion in antitrust damages identified as Google’s unjustly collected fees, the States Attorneys General settled for a $700 million payout.
Consumers will continue to overpay for digital goods as a result of Google's imposition of supracompetitive 30% fees for Google Play Billing or 26% junk fees on top of payments Google isn't involved in processing. Developers will also continue to be restricted in how they distribute their apps, and developers who choose to use a third party payment option will be forced to use Google's deceptively-labeled "user choice billing" system rather than having creative freedom over the design of their payment systems.
In Epic v. Google, a jury unanimously found that Google violated the antitrust laws in its dealings with developers, potential competitors, and OEMs. The States’ settlement does not address the core of Google’s unlawful and anticompetitive behavior. In the next phase of the case, Epic will seek meaningful remedies to truly open up the Android ecosystem so consumers and developers will genuinely benefit from the competition that U.S. antitrust laws were designed to promote.
I know this is about google. But didn't the apple judge say that apple would still be entitled to some sort of commission for the use of the appstore ? Which leads me to believe that google would also be.The main sticking point is Google still charges a commission for transactions made on their platform, but it is reduced by 4% if you use your own payment processor. Tim's endgame is to be listed on Google Play while avoiding paying Google any fees.
Something to that degree, yeah. Judge Donato has already said he won't "micromanage" Google's fees which means he isn't going to cap what Google Play can charge.I know this is about google. But didn't the apple judge say that apple would still be entitled to some sort of commission for the use of the appstore ? Which leads me to believe that google would also be.
I've not seen anything regarding EGS sales from the Insomniac leak. Either EGS sales are nominal or the team that drafted the report simply didn't include it for whatever reason.Since we got steam sales data from the insomniac leak, do we have any egs sales leaks? I mean we know they dont sell alot there, but its weird if they only have charts of steam sales.
Didn't epic want to simship more games not less. Reverse epic first run?This is the second game in several months with a planned EGS release that skipped it at launch. Either those new social features must be really good, or Epic's backend must be really bad.
I wonder how much they paid for it, since that game is basically dead.Also today's free game is probably DNF Duel.
I wonder how much they paid for it, since that game is basically dead.
What do you think lolEither those new social features must be really good, or Epic's backend must be really bad.
I've overcome my animosity against EGS and I've made a couple of purchases there