I think it deserved at least a 30%.![]()
20 vbucks to you for the follow up

I think it deserved at least a 30%.![]()
[UWSL]There is no legal basis, in my opinion, for forbidding every single thing Epic is doing on Apple's ecosystem simply based on their lawsuit and ToS infringement. [/UWSL]
Damn I hate saying this because Epic is a company whose behavior has been beyond the pale on PC, but blaming them for the actions of apple here is more or less victim blaming.
It is when the consequence is unrelated to these prior events. This is like saying they are justified in torching your house for speaking against them out of turn at a press conference. It's fair that you'd get kicked out, but any further is just unjustifiable.Is victim blaming if they started it?
Apple is a publicly traded company.Apple is a private company
Apple is a publicly traded company.
It is when the consequence is unrelated to these prior events. This is like saying they are justified in torching your house for speaking against them out of turn at a press conference. It's fair that you'd get kicked out, but any further is just unjustifiable.
I'm not a lawyer but I'm feeling it's quite obvious Apple is throwing its weight around beyond the confines of what that lawsuit and Fortnite infraction entails.
I don't think Apple is doing anything clearly illegal but they are doing something deeply wrong on a common sense level, is how I feel about this. Best I can reason anyway. Epic walked into this knowingly but that doesn't make Apple's abuse of their power okay.-snip-
Yeah, there's no possible way they didn't know, they either thought that all those devs were enough of a "protection" or they were willing to risk it and turn them into fodder, either outcome was ok for them.And I'm pretty sure Epic (or their lawyers) knew this could happen and they just accepted as collateral damage (potentially sacrifice some devs that Epic doesn't care about in the slightest and further advance the ''freedom fighters'' propaganda that they are cooking).
Yeah, I don't think there's a clear argument that the account suspensions are retaliatory.[UWSL]Another point is that Apple's ToS clearly states that the dev account may be suspended in case of abuse. Epic signed and agreed with this ToS. [/UWSL]
It is our stuff the moment we buy it.
Imagine Microsoft removing software from your PC you bought because of legal theatrics. It is bullshit.
I think such an argument is not completely unreasonable to make, if you accept the premises that having an Apple or Android smartphone is almost necessary for public life these days (given e.g. banking apps only available for those two platforms this isn't completely outlandish IMHO), and that Apple and Google therefore form a duopoly for an essential service. In such a case there are a few reasonable actions to take, regulation is one of them, splitting them up is another.
I very highly doubt any of that will happen in the current political climate in the US, and in this particular case where it's mostly Epic on the other end I also don't really care. From my perspective I can see any outcome as a win: if Apple loses they have to open up their ecosystem which is good, and if Epic loses Epic loses which is also good.
smartphones are still luxuries
[UWSL]Who was it who made Valve/Blizzard remove lootboxes? Belgium?[/UWSL]
Possible. Paid loot boxes are considered gambling here in Belgium.
The hardware is yours, but that EULA you just don't read dictates what kind of software can be legally on your hardware.
I just want all this to force Apple out of video games permanently now. Hopefully their own actions will frighten devs, crush future development, scare away mobile gamers, and lead to the downfall of the platform.
well they just fucked over a few apple arcade developers by cutting off epic.
And then what? Is Google having a complete monopoly on mobile OS so much better? Or what about a scummy company like Epic controlling a major part of games development by expanding their EGS strategy to other platforms?
doing anything clearly illegal but they are doing something deeply wrong on a common sense level, is how I feel about this.
That is quite true, but it's sad that a not-so-benevolent dictatorship is one of the only ways for corporations not to sell your newborn before you even date its mother or father.One defence of Apple and it's closed platform, and it's the safety aspect. Apple is pretty much the only company not trying to track everything about you and sell that data to everyone and anyone. Hell they even give you more control about that than any other platform.
So if Google would be the last big one left it would be a fucking horror show of dystopia shit. And I say this as an android user.
While that's true. You can't advertise that in the app, and a lot of people might not know or might see it as too many extra steps or don't want to add their payment methods in another site. It's harder than it looks to convert customers to change their habits.As I do not own any Apple products and I don't play Fortnite I was not aware that people can buy vbucks and such by opening epic's page from the phone's browser. I think this weakens Epic's complaint regarding in-app purchases since there is an easy way to accomplish the same task on the same device.
As I do not own any Apple products and I don't play Fortnite I was not aware that people can buy vbucks and such by opening epic's page from the phone's browser. I think this weakens Epic's complaint regarding in-app purchases since there is an easy way to accomplish the same task on the same device.
And many in-app transactions are inexpensive micro-transactions, situational or both—meaning that users who had to leave the app would be very unlikely to make the purchase. A user considering a $0.99 purchase is far less likely to complete a purchase if she must leave the app, navigate to a website or place a call, and wend through the purchasing process there before returning to the app.
well yeah, someone would have to be playing underlords to notice or complainAnecdotally, Valve does something similar with Dota Underlords, which is cross play Steam/iOS/Android.
You can purchase the season pass in the desktop versions through Steam, or in-app but it's slightly more expensive.
Notice how it was not a big deal. nobody complained, and I assume it was kind of an ok situation for all parties involved, players included.
the case against google is partially based on them threatening oems (oneplus) to not include other app stores in their devices on their supposedly open os or making deals to make sideloading apps on certain devices more difficult (lg). epic approached both of these companies to make a deal about including the epic store on their devices. they made a deal with oneplus but then oneplus backed out when threatened by google and lg said they'd already made a deal with google to restrict sideloaded apps.One thing I'm asking myself is on what feet the battle against google is standing.
For one there are other android stores, even Samsung has its Galaxy Store preinstalled on their Smartphones (Fortnite is on there, for example) and it is possible to install apps without the use of any store in the first place. I do not understand on what ground Epic is fighting Google here.
I'm not defending google here, I find their data and privacy collection disgusting and malicious.
But the Android OS itself is much more open than iOS, especially when it comes to installing apps.
The EULA doesn't always stand up in court, and I think we can both agree that the things Apple is doing are wrong. The law just has yet to catch up in my opinon.
I'm with Wok here too. I have experienced what it's like not to have a smartphone, or a non-functioning one. Banking? Emails? All of that cripples your ability to do about anything. It's very, very close to a necessity, one you have to pay hundreds of bucks for and that are designed to break and...
I'm grumpy.
I don't want to get into an argument that at the end of the day comes down to personal convictions with Phoenix RISING. I hope for the same outcome as you though.the eu courts will hopefully end up disagreeing with you, thank goodness.
the eu courts will hopefully end up disagreeing with you, thank goodness.
I think Epic would have a case if they could prove that Apple dominates the smartphone market entirely but that’s not the case. Microsoft did back in the 90s and that’s why the US government served them antitrust lawsuits.
if the actions that resulted in the motion for injunction are seen by the judge as especially harsh epic would have even lighter requirements to meet to get it granted.To obtain a preliminary injunction, a plaintiff must show: (1) “that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief”; (2) “that he is likely to succeed on the merits”; (3) “that the balance of equities tips in his favor”; and (4) “that an injunction is in the public interest.”
why would the operator of a walled garden being given full rights to that walled garden and precedent being set that banning other stores or purchase methods from your software/hardware platform be a good thing for games? i get the hate for epic here but to be rooting for the company wanting stricter anti-competitive measures to be allowed is mindboggling to me.For the sake of my favorite hobby, I hope Epic gets crushed by Apple in court. For the sake of mobile developers, I hope EU courts forces Apple to make some pro-developer changes.
Because Epic has demonstrated that they’re not worth the benefit of the doubt. It is not that they don’t like the rules, they just want to be the ones reaping the rewards of them.why would the operator of a walled garden being given full rights to that walled garden and precedent being set that banning other stores or purchase methods from your software/hardware platform be a good thing for games? i get the hate for epic here but to be rooting for the company wanting stricter anti-competitive measures to be allowed is mindboggling to me.
Out of nowhere, the most loathsome person you’ve ever met in your whole life chimed into the argument with a completely valid and irrefutable point. Every attempt to formulate a rebuttal to just the most insufferable asshole on the planet failed miserably because, for the first time ever, that piece of shit’s logic was entirely unassailable.