I mean, I have a Rl life too![]()
woo-hoo Ion Fury down. lets add it to the big board lashman . This is what i feel like to beat games around their release. I had forgotten
added!

I mean, I have a Rl life too![]()
woo-hoo Ion Fury down. lets add it to the big board lashman . This is what i feel like to beat games around their release. I had forgotten
Did something happen recently? You also have to remember that in general the press seems to think that Valve does nothing and that might also include anything Dota related. Also do the mainstream gaming press cover either Dota or CSGO stuff? I think they care more about Overwatch and LOL.You know, if the gaming press wanted an easy way to dunk on Valve, the mishandling of Dota's pro-scene would probably be a great place to start.
Namco is so weird with the store pages...
Ah, late Summer nights. There is a cicada outside my window making it's terribly loud screeching noise... but if I play Daoko music it stops. Then I turn off the music and it starts it shit again.
Can't say I mind too terribly, cuz I friggin' love Daoko, but I gotta sleep here sometime and I hope this bugger flies off to leave me alone before than...
Bring on Winter already. In Winter all the bugs here go away.
I friggin' love Daoko
Why is that some unreleased games have the prices displayed in my whistlist, but while some others don't?
Some examples are Code Vein, Dragon Ball Kakarot, and Destiny 2. You can already pre-purchase the games, but the prices aren't showing in whistist. Do publishers need to manually adjust them, or is it because of another factor? I think not displaying the price for pre-purchase phase is a huge mistake, as I often skip them while scrolling through my whistlist.
Yeah, it kind of did. Long story made slightly shorter, there was an unofficial, meme-ish tournament planned for the last week of September by a well known community personality (who, notably, has worked with Valve many times). Tickets have been for sale, an arena was ready, official sponsors were already secured, fans had participated in crowdfunding to raise over $15,000, and a prizepool of $150,000 was available (last time the tournament was held, the prizepool ended up being given to charity).Did something happen recently? You also have to remember that in general the press seems to think that Valve does nothing and that might also include anything Dota related. Also do the mainstream gaming press cover either Dota or CSGO stuff? I think they care more about Overwatch and LOL.
You're probably right. I can't believe that there's only one version of Cyberpunk 2077.I think it's because there's multiple purchase options like a deluxe version and stuff.
You're probably right. I can't believe that there's only one version of Cyberpunk 2077.
Anyway, it's a huge mistake because I wouldn't know if a game on my whistlist if finally available for purchase without visiting the store page. I believe lots of people have the same habit. Especially since putting a game on your whistlist is not enough, as you won't get updates if you're not also following the game.
These EGS exclusives that eventually come to steam put me in a moral quandary. I am not going to buy the games on EGS but I really dont want to reward the companies by paying full price day 1 on Steam (day 361) as that shows the company there is no downside to going EGS exclusive temporarily. Also EGS exclusives that come to Steam eventually will only ever be sold straight from Steam for the steam version, so we further wont be able to get discounts via Humble/GMG ect..
I'm not feeling it :/ it looks like a regular ass JRPG with better production values. I would rather have something like Xenoblade
The British government should regulate loot boxes under gambling law, a parliamentary inquiry has recommended.
After nearly nine months of evidence gathering, the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) Committee today published its 84-page report into immersive and addictive technologies.
Chief among its list of recommendations were that loot boxes should be regulated under gambling law, and there be a ban on selling them to children.
The inquiry took evidence from all corners of the industry -- including developers, trade bodies, and academics -- and reported a "lack of honesty and transparency" among social media and game company representatives.
DCMS Committee chair Damian Collins MP said it was time for gaming and social media companies to be more responsible, and challenged the government's current stance that loot boxes aren't gambling.
If the government wants to maintain that position even in light of the DCMS report, the committee said it should publish a paper explaining why loot boxes are exempt from the Gambling Act.
The committee noted that evidence around the potential harms of simulated gambling on children remains thin, and therefore recommended a precautionary approach going forward.
Additionally, the committee suggested that the UK government should advise PEGI to apply the existing gambling content label, and corresponding age limits, to games that feature loot boxes or similar mechanics of obfuscation and chance.
Aside from loot boxes, the scathing report recommended the games industry take responsibility for protecting players against potential harms and support independent research on the "long-term effects of gaming." It also expressed "serious concern" at the lack of robust age-verification systems.
Following the formal classification of gaming disorder by the World Health Organisation earlier this year, the committee also suggested the department should begin working with independent researchers immediately -- funded in-part by an industry tax -- and with game companies sharing aggregated player data.
The sharing of data for research purposes was something academics called for during the inquiry. When giving evidence to the committee in June, it was a sentiment echoed by King Digital head of portfolio and new games, Alex Dale, albeit with the caveat that data is "subject to normal commercial protections."
Commercially sensitive data proved somewhat of a sticking point throughout the evidence gathering process, with many game companies -- particularly Epic Games -- leveraging it as avoidance strategy when asked questions about typical player-spend and playtime, a tactic which saw MPs describe gaming companies as being "wilfully obtuse."
"Gaming contributes to a global industry that generates billions in revenue," said Collins. "It is unacceptable that some companies with millions of users and children among them should be so ill-equipped to talk to us about the potential harm of their products."
This attitude rankled Collins, who told GamesIndustry.biz back in June that game companies were "waiting to be told what to do by others" and only "paying lip service" to the problems.
Making comparisons to the gambling industry, it was noted that the games industry has "not sufficiently accepted responsibility for either understanding or preventing this harm."
Committee members paid particular attention to protections for vulnerable people during the inquiry, and the report shows that industry assurances fell short, as companies were "generally reluctant" to accept responsibility for player well being, or intervening if someone demonstrated abnormal spending.
The report even cited evidence that "gaming is several years behind gambling in relation to protecting the vulnerable" and highlights instances of people spending thousands of pounds on games like RuneScape and FIFA.
Finally, the committee suggested there may be need for legislation to protect children from playing games that are not appropriate for their age. This was born from a concern that companies are not enforcing age restrictions -- palming responsibility off to platform holders -- and inconsistencies around age-rating systems for online games, which are not legally enforceable.
UKIE CEO Dr Jo Twist said the trade body will review the recommendations with "utmost seriousness."
Although Dr Twist didn't specifically mention loot boxes, she said UKIE will consult with industry stakeholders on how to "demonstrate further our commitment to player safety."
"We have consistently been in dialogue with government and other key partners about establishing an appropriate research framework and will continue to do so," Dr Twist added.
"We are pleased the Committee acknowledges that the majority of people play video games in a positive, safe and responsible way. The industry does not dispute that, for a minority, finding balance is a problem. This is why we are vocal in supporting efforts to increase digital literacy and work with schools and carers on education programmes.
"We also welcome the Committee's recognition of good practice which already exists in the industry including pioneering community management and technical measures which ensure players have a safe experience online."
EA: no![]()
Parliamentary committee recommends banning loot box sales to children
The British government should regulate loot boxes under gambling law, a parliamentary inquiry has recommended.www.gamesindustry.biz
Yeah, I wasn't totally against it, but I'm certainly not impressed after watching the combat in action.I'm not feeling it :/ it looks like a regular ass JRPG with better production values. I would rather have something like Xenoblade
The combat reeeeally seems to drag down a lot. I hope this one is shorter because jeez.
It's not really a mainline game as it won't be called Yakuza 7. It's like a reboot.Really strange that they would mix things up that much in a mainline game in the series instead of a spin off or something.
For me it makes no sense to have goons and lowlifes taking turns to attack you instead of just overwhelm you. I see people raving about the satellite thing and sure it is funny but it will get tired by the third time you use it, especially if it is an unskipabble long animation.And I totally agree with you, a Xenoblade combat system would fit be better. Auto action while you can freely move, and execute special actions on cooldowns. There will also be moves that should be activated from the side/back of the enemy, as well as combination moves with your companions.
Sega of America was always right it seems.Yeah it looks like SEGA isnt pushing it as a mainline title in the west with that logo.
I'm not feeling it :/ it looks like a regular ass JRPG with better production values. I would rather have something like Xenoblade
The combat reeeeally seems to drag down a lot. I hope this one is shorter because jeez.
It's almost as if abusing your customer base has legal consequences and leads to regulation. They can probably rest assured though that US isn't gonna show that level of functioning government, at least on a federal level
Here's the wold smallest violin for video game publishers future MTX revenue
I guess I'll have to pass on this one. I'm sorry but this is not the kind of thing I buy Yakuza games for.The combat sure is flashy, though ... like a certain RPG featuring a black cat who simply won't shut up.![]()
I share the same point of view and I'm not sure the developers realize that many other people might do too... if people expect to pay less than day-0 prices when egsclusives finally come to Steam (or at least that the DLC be bundled by default)... wouldn't that result in a bigger loss than the dreaded 30%? Assuming, and it is a pretty safe assumption, that the number of copies sold on Steam is greater than on EGS...It's not really a quandary for me, I'm not buying games a year after release for more than they've been in sale for before. I'm interested in Observation since I really liked Stories Untold, but since it's already been $12.49 I'm not gonna be paying more than $10 for it when it's a year old.
At least Sakura Taisen looks good
The real winner here is going to be Death Stranding fans in about 25 minutes.Man what a sad day. Between Asymmetrical RE multiplayer shit and Yakuza rpg shenanigans, two kicks in the balls in less than 4 hours.
At least Sakura Taisen looks good
RIP epic![]()
Maybe this is why Epic is in such a hurry to establish itself as a games distributor. They're worried that governments around the world will kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.
I really, really want to see what a lootbox ban would do to these scummy companies. EA especially is fucked.
Or am I just slow to notice this update change?
I didn't watch it but the news was somewhat interesting to me. I thought the iphone 11 looked really cool, and the $699 price wasn't too bad either.
Death Stranding:![]()
Death Stranding:![]()
Sometimes you just gotta macarena through expensive tech.My mind can not begin to fathom such an opinion.
It's 700$ for a phone.
The only singular items i ever bought that were this expensive were cars, motorcycles and mopeds.
My last smart phone is a Galaxy A5 for 250$.
700$ is so much money
What I find funny about DS is that nobody would give less of a shit if it wasnt because Kojima is involved.Death Stranding:![]()
I think epics motivation for going against steam was mostly about them wanting to have 100% of MTX money. Just like they didn't want to be on Google Store and made their own client for phones and such.
I think it's been like that for a few days nowLooks like Steam updated the Recent Updates feed on store pages
Here is a screenshot from Sydney Hunter update
![]()
Or am I just slow to notice this update change?
They probably wanted even more! But yeah it's probably a combination, meaning if they get more people to use EGS to buy games then they have even more people who could potentially buy Fortnight MTXs.I don't think that's all there is to it. They already had their own client so they already kept 100% of MTX. I think that Epic's push is an attempt to establish a stable revenue stream for themselves before Fortnite goes out of fashion for whatever reason.
Ya know what
Had SWERY ever got to meet David Lynch?
I still hold that the "You wouldn't care if Kojima wasn't involved" argument is an incredibly stupid position. Like no shit the weirdo auteur is the whole draw here!What I find funny about DS is that nobody would give less of a shit if it wasnt because Kojima is involved.
Thatd be a more interesting thing to happen than Kojima meeting celebrity x :vi don't think so
But I met David Lynch! Well not really meet but he walked past me when I was sitting on some stairs taking a break.Ya know what
Had SWERY ever got to meet David Lynch?
My mind can not begin to fathom such an opinion.
It's 700$ for a phone.
The only singular items i ever bought that were this expensive were cars, motorcycles and mopeds.
My last smart phone is a Galaxy A5 for 250$.
700$ is so much money
Haters gonna hate,
Kojima gibt keinen Fick auf die Nutten,
denn man blickt nicht nach unten,
wenn man den Weg nach oben geht.