Community Movies/Shows you have seen recently or looking forward to...

TioChuck

More Yellow 🤷‍♂️
Dec 31, 2018
1,361
3,245
113
35
Just finished part 2 of Masters of the Universe Revalation, its pretty great!

The ending tho'. I need She-Ra in this universe! Hope for a season 2 announcement soon!
 

OFF

MetaMember
Oct 10, 2018
5,103
14,610
113
Yeah, I read a few after watching and all of them are exactly what you have described. Many people fail to understand that the 2016 reboot was badmouthed because it is a bad Ghostbuster movie, instead of anything relating to masculinity or hate towards women.

Some also bring up the point that Afterlife is too "fan servicey" and it is a negative... I mean, the original movies are like 30 something years ago, and considering what this movie really is meant to be to the franchise, they should include references to the originals. And honestly? Most of them are very minor and new audience won't even know some of these things or lines are references. These reviews are ridiculous.
Getting back to this topic, a new review popped-up on my twitter feed for the film (from rogerebert.com), and I really have to laugh, even considering I'm yet to watch the film: it's another 1 star review, from a woman that spent a big portion of the review writing the following, which I now quote:

«This is sort of a sequel and sort of a reboot, but it’s definitely an erasure of the 2016 “Ghostbusters” starring Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Kate McKinnon and Leslie Jones, which caused such a stir because it dared to feature women busting ghosts. That’s men’s work! Women are allowed to answer the phone at Ghostbusters headquarters, and they can be possessed by an ancient demon from another dimension as long as they still look sexy, but that’s about it. Come on, guys. When Ray Parker Jr. sang that busting made him feel good, we all knew what he was really talking about. (And yes, that catchy theme song is in here, too, playing over the end credits. It’s truly bizarre in retrospect to realize that it was a massive radio and MTV hit in 1984.)»


---

I really have no words.
It seems a big batch of "critics" are now unable to watch the film, a "popcorn" flick that apparently has been well received with audiences, and see it as anything other than an attack on women.

Absolutely ridiculous.
 

Cacher

Romantic Storm
Jun 3, 2020
2,317
6,467
113
Getting back to this topic, a new review popped-up on my twitter feed for the film (from rogerebert.com), and I really have to laugh, even considering I'm yet to watch the film: it's another 1 star review, from a woman that spent a big portion of the review writing the following, which I now quote:

«This is sort of a sequel and sort of a reboot, but it’s definitely an erasure of the 2016 “Ghostbusters” starring Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Kate McKinnon and Leslie Jones, which caused such a stir because it dared to feature women busting ghosts. That’s men’s work! Women are allowed to answer the phone at Ghostbusters headquarters, and they can be possessed by an ancient demon from another dimension as long as they still look sexy, but that’s about it. Come on, guys. When Ray Parker Jr. sang that busting made him feel good, we all knew what he was really talking about. (And yes, that catchy theme song is in here, too, playing over the end credits. It’s truly bizarre in retrospect to realize that it was a massive radio and MTV hit in 1984.)»
The new Ghostbusters in Afterlife has girls. The rhetoric they try to push is complete nonsense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OFF

OFF

MetaMember
Oct 10, 2018
5,103
14,610
113
The new Ghostbusters in Afterlife has girls. The rhetoric they try to push is complete nonsense.
I'm yet to watch the film, but even I know there's 2 girls (in a group of 4) in the main cast, plus the mother of the kids, and the main character is Egon's granddaughter.

This attempt to pass the idea that people hated the previous film not because it was absolutely lousy (with Kate McKinnon being the saving grace, but even her had to do with a script that was a pile of crap), but because it had girls, while this one somehow takes away girls altogether is absolutely ridiculous.

Again, I'm yet to even watch the film, so I may not end up liking it, but I really don't understand these "reviews" that don't review the film, but simply insult and attack a fan base, just because these "critics" somehow think the film is an attack on women.

People these days are less interested in the quality of a film, how's the script, and how well it's shot, and apparently all that matters is counting how many women are in the cast, how many people of a certain "minority" are in the cast, and so on.
Frankly, it's exhausting. I was someone who went to the cinema sometimes multiple times a week, and now I go a couple of times in a year.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Cacher

Cacher

Romantic Storm
Jun 3, 2020
2,317
6,467
113
People these days are less interested in the quality of a film, how's the script, and how well it's shot, and apparently all that matters is counting how many women are in the cast, how many people of a certain "minority" are in the cast, and so on.
Frankly, it's exhausting. I was someone who went to the cinema sometimes multiple times a week, and now I got a couple of times in a year.
Being an Asian I find this kind of representation push is pointless and annoying as well. Not every cast has to have one woman, one black and one Asian. What characters are needed should entirely depend on when the story takes place and what kind of a story that the talents behind want to tell.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: OFF

OFF

MetaMember
Oct 10, 2018
5,103
14,610
113
Being an Asian I find this kind of representation push is pointless and annoying as well. Not every cast has to have one woman, one black and one Asian. What characters are needed should entirely depend on when the story takes place and what kind of a story that the talents behind want to tell.
Never once did I watch a Spike Lee film and said to myself "I need to see some white people in there". Never once did I see one of Barry Levinson's Baltimore films, taking place in Jewish neighbourhoods and families, and said to myself "it needed to have some Christians in there".
Not to mention, I always watched a lot of Asian cinema (particularly from Hong Kong, genre efforts like The Seventh Curse, which I absolutely adore), and I can't say I ever wanted to see those films, but with caucasian people.

This "statistical" representation that most big Hollywood studios push for, and these supposed film "critics" so much care about, is not done out of actually caring for people feeling represented, but it's a pure, cynical, marketing move, nothing more.
All my life, I watched cinema from all over the world. European, American (North and South), Asian, Australian, African, (...). I always liked to see other cultures represented, by their own accord, in their own productions. And I lamented the fact that most of these films never reached wider audiences in Western countries, particularly in the US, because none would get a cinema release, or would end up cut, and dubbed to English.

But, this crap about doing the same old stuff (be it superhero films, action efforts, ...), keeping the exact same scripts and tone, and just switching a male white lead character for a women, or a black/asian actor, I'm not sure what kind of "representation" that is.
 

OFF

MetaMember
Oct 10, 2018
5,103
14,610
113
I always loved Italian cinema, but in recent years, that love expanded to Italian TV content.

I'm quite "disenchanted" with most US series I see on TV (come on, how many Walking Dead seasons and spin-offs, or super-hero series can be shown during the course of a week? :grinning-face-with-smiling-eyes:), I really have no patience for CGI fests, the same plastic looking people, and rapid cuts left and right, like the director suffers from ADD, because "god forbid" we get some character development and interactions, while taking away some precious seconds for more TV commercials. :disapproval-blob:

Anyway, excuse the ramblings of an old fart. :LOL:

I basically wanted to profess my love for some of the Italian TV series I've been watching, and suggest people who want to check something a bit different from most US TV content to check out some Italian TV series.
They have some awesome shows. I've spent the last 20+ years watching Il Commissario Montalbano, and I can't recommend it enough. I'll speak in more detail about it some other time.

The last series I watched, and had an awesome time doing so, was Rocco Schiavone. It's a tv series about a very flawed, but just, cop, wonderfully shot, with lovely locations, lovely women, and a very paced, and at times melancholic tone. Each episode, like most Italian TV series I've been watching, is feature length, so the story has time to build.
I know the series is in some streaming services, and cable channels worldwide, so if you get the chance to watch this show, consider doing so, it's well worth a look.

The first series is directed by Michele Soavi, who horror fans may know as being a Dario Argento protégé, and director of films like Dellamorte Dellamore (aka Cemetery Man), Stage Fright, The Church, and The Sect.

Here's a couple of subtitled trailers from different countries, with different tones, which hopefully may pick your interest:

 
  • Like
Reactions: Cacher

OFF

MetaMember
Oct 10, 2018
5,103
14,610
113
Last article about Ghostbusters: Afterlife, I promise. :)

I mean, I can't resist posting a hilarious text that is titled "We Should Have Cherished the 2016 Ghostbusters When We Had the Chance", that has pearls like the following:
«when the movie from director Paul Feig and starring Kristen Wiig, Melissa McCarthy, Leslie Jones, and McKinnon dropped over five years ago, we didn’t give ourselves a chance to bask in its comedic brilliance»



I mean, the author can't be serious, right? Surely, it has to be a joke article? :thinking-face:
 

OFF

MetaMember
Oct 10, 2018
5,103
14,610
113
McKenna Grace alone on Afterlife > the 4 leads of the 2016 one.
I'm going to (finally) watch the new film later today (it released later in Europe than the US) in about 4 hours, and like I mentioned before I may even end up not liking it, but all these articles from a bunch of "critics" that review the new film by purely attacking it, while lauding the previous one, because they perceive the new film as an attack on women, are truly bizarre, and as a film fan infuriating. This is not film criticism. This is a bunch of hipsters mistaking film criticism, with social media posting.

I'm a big fan of the franchise, and pretty open-minded. I mean, Extreme Ghostbusters was a good lesson on that front: I reacted poorly to the news of a new animation series that mostly excluded the original characters, replacing them for some teens with "edgy" designs, and you know what, when I finally watched the series, I really enjoyed it. So, I went to watch the previous film hoping for the best (on my birthday!), and giving it a fair chance. I ended up annoyed, and bored to tears. It was painfully dull, mediocre, with barely any redeeming qualities. It didn't work as a Ghostbusters film, and it didn't work as a comedy either.

How that turd gets now lauded for its "comedic brilliance" is utterly perplexing.
I've even seen plenty of people saying the 2016 film is better than the originals!
I'm getting old. :grinning-face-with-smiling-eyes:
 
Last edited:

OFF

MetaMember
Oct 10, 2018
5,103
14,610
113
Just came back from watching Ghostbusters: Afterlife. My first time at the cinema in nearly two years (the last time was December 2019).

And you know what? I dug it a lot. I had a really great time.
It's part "80's child adventure film" in the vein of what Amblin Entertainment and others used to put out, part heart-warming tribute to Egon/Harold Ramis, and more importantly, it breathes some new life into the franchise.

If indeed the film continues to do well at the box office, there's potential for sequels/spin-offs that could go into different directions.

If anyone is going to watch the film, don't leave until the credits are finished. You will seriously regret it, since there's 2 scenes, one at the end of the first section of the credits, and another after the credits are finished, and the last one is particularly "big", and interesting.

The mid-credits sequence is great because

it's a rare occasion to see the "old" Bill Murray back, smiling and genuinely appearing to have fun, with none other than Sigourney Weaver. :cat-heart-blob:

The scene after the end credits is rather interesting, and surprisingly "big" for such placement, since

it gives Ernie Hudson his due, making his character a much bigger deal than what came before, and it hints at various possibilities for the franchise. Will we see a new film with (at least some of) the old cast back? Will we see Winston Zeddemore reviving the Ghostbusters brand, and acting as a bit of mentor to a new team? The scene, besides showing a few familiar locations, actually shows that there's some interesting possibilities to move the franchise forward. :thumbsupblob:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Comfy
Reactions: Li Kao and Cacher

Le Pertti

31.85% Steam Boy 100% Xbox Bro
Oct 10, 2018
5,907
12,876
113
42
Paris, France
pertti.fr
Just came home from watching Ghostbusters, loved it! Had to wait a few days because I was sick but worth the wait. It such a perfect example to compare to the 2016 version and you can see when a movie is made with heart and when a movie isn't.
 
  • Comfy
Reactions: Cacher

kio

MetaMember
Apr 19, 2019
753
2,165
93
Anyone know what happened with the new Jon Steward show? They released 4 episodes and then just stopped... it's been almost a month since the last one.
 

EdwardTivrusky

Good Morning, Weather Hackers!
Dec 8, 2018
5,284
9,838
113
Trailer 2.0


I stopped watching about halfway through as i'd rather watch the film and i thought they were getting close to "Trailer explains the whole film" territory which i hate.
 
  • Eyes
Reactions: Pommes