Because people don't care or don't know.
iirc I just used DLSS
That's actually just it. It's weird for them to go with a sexless RE4, unless is Ashley supposed to be underage although she looks older now? I just wish they could do it cleverly.
It's funny you mention the rain because that stood out to me too. I really thought it might be a 'me' problem.
Yeah I think a lot of this is how playable RE4 still is. The immediate reaction I have to the remake is that it doesn't impress me like RE2 did, but they arguably had a much easier chance to impress going from ps1 to ps4 graphics. I'm sure RE4 will play fine and probably be a good enough time but I'm not really seeing a lot that wows me. Visually I think it looks surprisingly rough, not just the rain effects but the lighting appears uneven and a lot of textures seem very muddy. Some of the changes or additions I'm very iffy on like they flat out admitted they're adding fetch quests to the game and that they have little charms that give passives (I have an increasingly extreme dislike of games with loot and junk stats like +1.5% look down sight speed). And there are more minor concerns like dialog being changed and wondering if this or that moment will be in the game.
Yes I agree with this entirely. RE2 remake is a whole new experience. With RE4 I expected a similar renovation - whatever it may be. And you're right that RE4, similar to Dead Space is still perfectly playable.
www.gematsu.com
How is FSR and XeSS anyways (compared to DLSS)?
We know awards and picks are bullshit. But...
I mean I don't really judge either, but thought for those that do, big public pushing and funding something would be worse than a singular person just getting it. So was surprised that in fact no does care as you said.XD
I suppose the power balance between anti and pro (for lack of a better word) is not loop sided enough for Sony to care. Corporations walk back on things when the optic is super bad for them, and I guess this is not at that level.
FSR 2.x is a solid alternative to DLSS and it works on a broader amount of GPUs too. It's still not as good as DLSS, it can produce some artifacts in certain scenarios but AMD has been updating this tech pretty regularly to fix the most glaring issues. XeSS is the worst of the bunch I think. IIRC it introduces much more input lag compared to FSR and DLSS, and the reconstructed image quality is mixed. It works on a lot of GPUs too.
And sites that openly promote the game, can't really fault the general populace too much when big sites putting out articles telling people what's the best deals for it, how awesome the game that's not out might be.
Shader are compiled right at the start of the game so it seems to be a broader problem according to reviews.
Maybe we could use the abbreviation "HWL"?Read this as "PC Port of Half-Life not looking so hot."
I can't be surprised anymore it's happening with almost literally every AA/AAA release. I'm only now sitting down and reading a few reviews but I've had people mention to me that the ps5 version doesn't seem so hot either. Hard to believe this is expected to run not only on last gen systems but the freakin switch too.
You would think Devs should have fully figured UE4 out at this point but i guess not.
The combat is being widely praised. If anything what hurts it a bit is the lack of simulation aspects. The classes seem to be mostly window dressing that don't exist outside of story missions and there's no rules you have to follow as a student outside of a few forced stealth missions involving breaking curfew.
That's not really relevant as long as the author keeps using her clout and wealth to hurt real people.
