But what it does in this case is that it works against us, the consumers.
I also disagree here. People insulting Ooblet doesn't effect us consumers, at all. Devs are going EGS exclusive because of money and not because Ooblet is being insulted. I do not see any kind of correlation here. It's actually quiet the opposite, there is a pretty clear timeline here:
1.) Dev announces games and captures the interest of consumers
2.) Dev gets money from Epic
3.) Exclusivity gets announced
4.) Dev preemptively insults critiques
5.) Dev gets insulted
Eliminating point 5 would do nothing, because it's at the end of a chain. It's not nice and nothing to be proud of, it doesn't help but it also doesn't change anything.
Piranha had a good and supporting mechwarrior community. Shenmu 3 had a loving community. People were celebrating Snapshot Games and Phoenix Point.
Those three games have two things in common:
1.) Loving Fans that went out of their way to help finance the products with their own money.
2.) Went EGS exclusive, after years of fan support. Just a couple of months before release.
You see, the amount of "love" and support you throw at them is irrelevant. They'll throw you under the buss and take whatever bag of money they can find.
So please spare me this "pour devs need more love or they'll go EGS exclusive" thing: Most of us have supported games beyond what's reasonable. We helped bringing them to live, in a world where even pre-orders for AAA can result in disasters (FO76 and Anthem anybody?).
We supported them because we liked and believed in certain dev studios. We all have been thanked with a middle finger, a kick in the nuts and an insult here and there. No amount of blowing sugar into their asses helped. A couple twitter insults have zero impact on their future decision and yes, you are very naive to think otherwise.