News Epic Games Store

Wildebeet

First Stage Hero
Dec 5, 2018
798
1,883
93
Ooblets looks like it's doing fine, actually. I'd be very surprised if it wasn't out this year.

The thing I wonder is if they wouldn't have done better financially without the EGS thing. So Epic pays based on an agreed upon amount what you would have sold if not for exclusivity. That's a guess number, maybe even a little on the high side. But I wonder if developers of games that turn out to be surprisingly successful, like Goose Game, kind of realize that they'd have made much more if they just went the Steam route in the first place, even with the 30% cut for Valve.

I suspect that Ooblets on EGS will mostly benefit Epic, not the developer due to opportunity cost.
 

Joe Spangle

Playing....
Apr 17, 2019
2,423
8,232
113
Ooblets looks like it's doing fine, actually. I'd be very surprised if it wasn't out this year.

The thing I wonder is if they wouldn't have done better financially without the EGS thing. So Epic pays based on an agreed upon amount what you would have sold if not for exclusivity. That's a guess number, maybe even a little on the high side. But I wonder if developers of games that turn out to be surprisingly successful, like Goose Game, kind of realize that they'd have made much more if they just went the Steam route in the first place, even with the 30% cut for Valve.

I suspect that Ooblets on EGS will mostly benefit Epic, not the developer due to opportunity cost.
Yep. Its seems a bit of a shame, like these Devs don't have faith in their product and so take the guarantee payout. I get that its a tough business but personally I think i would want to have as many people as possible playing my game, thats the whole point isnt it? If not then just go get a day job like the rest of us regular Joes.

Taking eggs money says to me that you think your game is lacking the strength to sell on its own and you care more about the money side of games making than the artistic side. If thats the case just become EA :p
 

Ge0force

Excluding exclusives
Jan 12, 2019
4,025
13,957
113
Belgium
Yep. Its seems a bit of a shame, like these Devs don't have faith in their product and so take the guarantee payout.
I don't think it has to do with faith. It's a hard reality that only a very small minority of games is (very) successful on Steam. Plenty of very good games failed to reach a wide audience.

Financial security - in other words: being able to pay your rent - is a huge reason for indies to take an exclusivity deal. I don't blame them for doing so. I do blame them for being jerks about it tho.
 

Joe Spangle

Playing....
Apr 17, 2019
2,423
8,232
113
Financial security - in other words: being able to pay your rent - is a huge reason for indies to take an exclusivity deal. I don't blame them for doing so. I do blame them for being jerks about it tho.
Yeah i get that and like i say i know its a tough business but if you want financial security then being an indie games developer is not a good choice for profession in this day and age. This is a creative industry for which the main point (in my opinion) should be having people experience your creations. Doing it for the money takes some of the heart out of it. And yeah, they dont have to be jerks. Id be more receptive if they just said 'look, we need the money and dont want the risk of competing with the umpteen games releasing today on Steam'.
 

prudis

anime occult member
Sep 19, 2018
10,268
26,876
113
The Kingdom of Beer and Porn
twitter.com

Kyougar

No reviews, no Buy
Nov 2, 2018
3,176
11,419
113
I don't think it has to do with faith. It's a hard reality that only a very small minority of games is (very) successful on Steam. Plenty of very good games failed to reach a wide audience.

Financial security - in other words: being able to pay your rent - is a huge reason for indies to take an exclusivity deal. I don't blame them for doing so. I do blame them for being jerks about it tho.
Making games on your own and expecting financial security is the first error they make. Flipping burgers is more financially secure.
 

Kyougar

No reviews, no Buy
Nov 2, 2018
3,176
11,419
113
I'd rather make games than flipping burgers as well to be honest 😂
Sure, I would do the same. but I would NOT expect financial security.
It's like in any passionate occupation or sport, even if you are good, it is not a given that you get success.
  • You can be the acting prodigy of your town, it doesn't mean that you will get success in Hollywood. But your buddy/rival who had a unique acting method stood out and got an Oscar, while you competed with thousands upon thousands of acting prodigies who also were very good at Shakespearean acting.
  • You can be the best kart racer ever and not make it into Formula 1.
  • etc.

"look at me I have this awesome Metroidvania/3D or 2D Platformer I am special, buy my product" doesn't cut it.
 

Kyougar

No reviews, no Buy
Nov 2, 2018
3,176
11,419
113
Agreed. But if someone offered you financial security, you wouldn't refuse it either, no matter how much faith I have in my game. That's what I was trying to say. 😁
But is it the right choice?

Let's say you are working on a prototype (regardless of the field, either mechanical, electronics, software, farming, etc.) and want to patent it. several companies give you buttloads of money but you lose the rights to the product or just get very little from sales.
you never made money off it, yet and you sunk an immense amount of your own money into it. Do you sell it to the corporations for a lump-sum and some crumbs, or are do you have faith in your product and be the new Benz/Ford/Edison/Newell/Zuckerberg etc.

Translating that to gaming, you could be the new Factorio, Mount and Blade, Rimworld, Kerbal Space Program, etc.
But that needs passion, faith in your product and work, communicating with your fans, talent, the right Genre, etc.
If not, you are the next Rune II
 

beep boop

MetaMember
Dec 6, 2018
2,170
4,558
113
yeah, extremely disappointing ... but then again - they were already on my shitlist after doing all the shit they did with KF2
I'm only a Red Orchestra / Rising Storm fan so idk! Honestly, whatever gets those games to be more popular. I'll wait a year, fine. But more people need to get on the RO/RS train :face-with-tears-of-joy:
 
  • Like
Reactions: lashman

Ge0force

Excluding exclusives
Jan 12, 2019
4,025
13,957
113
Belgium
But is it the right choice?

Let's say you are working on a prototype (regardless of the field, either mechanical, electronics, software, farming, etc.) and want to patent it. several companies give you buttloads of money but you lose the rights to the product or just get very little from sales.
you never made money off it, yet and you sunk an immense amount of your own money into it. Do you sell it to the corporations for a lump-sum and some crumbs, or are do you have faith in your product and be the new Benz/Ford/Edison/Newell/Zuckerberg etc.

Translating that to gaming, you could be the new Factorio, Mount and Blade, Rimworld, Kerbal Space Program, etc.
But that needs passion, faith in your product and work, communicating with your fans, talent, the right Genre, etc.
If not, you are the next Rune II
I'm not sure it's the right choice. But looking at how successful former EGS exclusives are on Steam, I'd like to believe so.

It seems the majority of EGS haters doesn't hold a grudge against devs and publishers for taking Epic's money, and just buy the moneyhatted games when they are being released in other storefronts.

Also, these games are getting a second release after 12 months, paired with extra (media) attention. No doubt this helps getting extra sales as well.

Last but not least the Satisfactory devs have succeeded in building a big and loyal user base as well, despite the exclusivity.

So in theory, these devs are getting guaranteed money for the amount of projected sales on pc, plus extra revenue from the successful Steam release a year later, without significant damage to their reputation. This almost sounds too good to be true, so I wonder if I'm missing something. Why would Annapurna stop releasing on EGS if it was so great?
 

Kyougar

No reviews, no Buy
Nov 2, 2018
3,176
11,419
113
It is a devil's proof, though. We can't know if they wouldn't have had a bigger success without the moneyhat.
And the people boycotting the publisher/dev aren't zero, which means lost customers, maybe forever (like me)

for me personally, it soured me on Deep Silver, Annapurna, and Devolver Digital. especially DD shat the bed and exposed that the Anti-establishment comedy is just that, comedy.

Any game from devs from these 3 publishers is an automatic pass for me now. Indie devs always got a benefit of the doubt from me, I was always at least interested in what they got if the genre was a match. Now they opened my eyes that most indies are just entitled assholes or slaves of their corporate overlords that don't care about their fanbase.

My gaming purchases nearly scratched to a halt since early 2019, And i play my old games more and more often, I even fucking played World of Warcraft again for 1,5 months. fucking world of Warcraft, so disenfranchised and disappointed I am with the current market.
 

lashman

Dead & Forgotten
Sep 5, 2018
30,683
86,403
113

Gaming has seen something of a continental drift for years. The biggest games are ballooning into more massive projects. And on the other end, a deluge of indie creators are flooding digital stores with smaller releases. And in the middle? Almost nothing. But publishing company Take-Two Interactive Entertainment has spent the last few years attempting to address that with its Private Division label. During a fireside chat as part of the GamesBeat Summit 2020, Take-Two corporate development and indie-publishing boss Michael Worosz said that was always the goal.


“When we first wrote the business strategy for Private Division in 2013 and 2014, the landscaped looked — from far away — like two very different bookends,” said Worosz. “You have triple-A and quad-A along the lines of the content that Rockstar is known for. And then a red ocean of small indie games with small budgets. And there wasn’t anything in the middle.”


So Take-Two set out to find opportunities in this part of the market with Private Division. And this matched up well with a growth in the number of developers with a lot of skill and experience starting their own companies.. One example of that is the sci-fi shooter Disintegration from developer V1 Interactive.


V1 cofounder Marcus Lehto had 20 years at Destiny studio Bungie. And his team is capable of producing something that looks bigger and more expensive than most other indies. That’s the exact kind of product that could benefit from a partnership with Private Division. The Take-Two label has marketing muscle and existing relationships with media outlets. And that can ensure Disintegration doesn’t get lost in the noise.

Take-Two feels validated by Epic’s publishing plans

But Private Division isn’t alone in this space anymore. Epic recently revealed plans to publish games from the developers of Control, Limbo, and The Last Guardian. This is a more direct approach that follows Epic’s spending to keep games off of Steam for a limited time. Now, instead of finding games that are nearing completion, Epic is funding 100% of the development of new games from its partner studios.


It’s a big plan aimed right at the kinds of bigger-budget independent projects that Private Division was pursuing. And Take-Two acknowledges that.


“Competition validates what we were doing with Private Division,” said Worosz. “It gives developers another publisher to turn to. Although — developers that go with Epic might be constrained into publishing on the Epic Games Store, and I think that might limit the opportunity for studios who want to reach a broader audience on Steam. But they’re a tremendous partner with deep pockets, great tools, and an understanding of the gaming audience.”

Take-Two is determined to invest in new properties

But while Private Division is working to do stir up something from gaming’s forgotten middle-class, it’s also thinking about tomorrow’s blockbusters.


“You always have to be planting the seeds for new intellectual property,” said Worosz. “Our industry really depends on sequels for the bigger economic opportunities. But if you’re over dependent on sequels, I think you can wring the opportunity dry. And you have to plant the seeds to harvest tomorrow.”


Again, this is a long-term play for Take-Two. Almost no brand new gaming property is going to deliver results like a Red Dead Redemption 2 (let alone a Grand Theft Auto sequel). But what’s the next franchise to generate a Red Dead Redemption 2? Take-Two is trying to identify and grow those. And that can fill out and replenish the company’s offerings between releases from Rockstar, 2K, and Private Division.
 

Arsene

On a break
Apr 17, 2019
3,279
8,303
113
Canada
“Competition validates what we were doing with Private Division,” said Worosz. “It gives developers another publisher to turn to. Although — developers that go with Epic might be constrained into publishing on the Epic Games Store, and I think that might limit the opportunity for studios who want to reach a broader audience on Steam. But they’re a tremendous partner with deep pockets, great tools, and an understanding of the gaming audience.”
Guess this means no more EGS exclusives from Take Two? Or Private Division at least.
 

C-Dub

Makoto Niijima Fan Club President
Dec 23, 2018
3,992
11,886
113
Private Division are not going to sign exclusives with a competitor's storefront when one of their big selling points to potential development partners is where their game will be sold on PC. If you're going to make your games exclusive to EGS, you lose to Epic publishing. Epic's terms and undoubtedly more generous to developers, at least at the moment. Not being tied to EGS is going to be one of the plusses going forward, since that store is an albatross around any game's neck.

I wouldn't discount 2K or R* from signing more deals, however.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lashman

TioChuck

More Yellow 🤷‍♂️
Dec 31, 2018
1,727
4,312
113
37
“Competition validates what we were doing with Private Division,” said Worosz. “It gives developers another publisher to turn to. Although — developers that go with Epic might be constrained into publishing on the Epic Games Store, and I think that might limit the opportunity for studios who want to reach a broader audience on Steam. But they’re a tremendous partner with deep pockets, great tools, and an understanding of the gaming audience.”
Ain´t that a kick in the balls? :shrugblob:

This just tells me that their plan was always to grab Epic´s moneyhat, dont sell nothing, and make the bulk of sales on Steam.:smart-thinking-blob:
 

fantomena

MetaMember
Dec 17, 2018
9,703
26,041
113
Ain´t that a kick in the balls? :shrugblob:

This just tells me that their plan was always to grab Epic´s moneyhat, dont sell nothing, and make the bulk of sales on Steam.:smart-thinking-blob:
That bolded part in the quote somewhat reads like regret or simply using Epic to get a quick paycheck and get the broader audience on Steam.

Might mirror what looks like is Sonys thought process, release Predator and Readyset Heroes on Epic for a quick paycheck, but release Horizon on Steam to reach the actual PC audience.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Phoenix RISING

TioChuck

More Yellow 🤷‍♂️
Dec 31, 2018
1,727
4,312
113
37
That bolded part in the quote somewhat reads like regret or simply using Epic to get a quick paycheck and get the broader audience on Steam.

Might mirror what looks like is Sonys thought process, release Predator and Readyset Heroes on Epic for a quck, but release Horizon on Steam to reach the actual PC audience.
Patrice Désilets can´t get a break, I doubt he saw any money T2/PD made from the deal with Epic, and Ancestors came and went, and I doubt anybody will give a shit when it eventually hit Steam.


I wonder if this will cause some people to not bother with the free games?
I think this is pressure from the devs, because of bots.

I don´t think Epic wants the bots to stop, they inflate the numbers in Epics favor a lot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C-Dub and lashman

Kyougar

No reviews, no Buy
Nov 2, 2018
3,176
11,419
113

I wonder if this will cause some people to not bother with the free games?
For some, sure. I mostly ignore freebies on origin or uplay, because I have to either
  • find my password
  • update the client
  • get a 2FA code from my spam folder which I have to open in the web-browser because Spam only gets displayed every 24hours in Outlook.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lashman

Ge0force

Excluding exclusives
Jan 12, 2019
4,025
13,957
113
Belgium
It is a devil's proof, though. We can't know if they wouldn't have had a bigger success without the moneyhat.
And the people boycotting the publisher/dev aren't zero, which means lost customers, maybe forever (like me)
Agreed. I believe people boycotting the publisher/dev are a very small minority, but for me it feels the right thing to do as well.

So far I've ignored every game involved in Epic's moneyhats, with the exception of early access games that release in multiple storefronts when finished. The only EGS exclusives I still want to play are Control and Metro Exodus, but chances are these games will appear on Humble Choice later.

I've also added a few publishers (Deep Silver, Annapurna, Big Ben, Ubisoft and Private Division) to my blacklist for being deeply in bed with Epic. I won't hold a grudge forever against these publishers since it's only business for them, but for now I'm ignoring their games completely.

I've also blacklisted a few devs (Ooblets, Phoenix Point etc) for being jerks towards their fans or for selling their backers to Epic. I won't ever support these devs anymore.
 

goat

Mass Erect
Jan 21, 2019
176
534
93
Agreed. I believe people boycotting the publisher/dev are a very small minority, but for me it feels the right thing to do as well.

So far I've ignored every game involved in Epic's moneyhats, with the exception of early access games that release in multiple storefronts when finished. The only EGS exclusives I still want to play are Control and Metro Exodus, but chances are these games will appear on Humble Choice later.

I've also added a few publishers (Deep Silver, Annapurna, Big Ben, Ubisoft and Private Division) to my blacklist for being deeply in bed with Epic. I won't hold a grudge forever against these publishers since it's only business for them, but for now I'm ignoring their games completely.

I've also blacklisted a few devs (Ooblets, Phoenix Point etc) for being jerks towards their fans or for selling their backers to Epic. I won't ever support these devs anymore.
Your Blacklist looks like mine, except I also have blacklisted SuperGiant.
 

Arsene

On a break
Apr 17, 2019
3,279
8,303
113
Canada
EGS finally added CAD support but some publishers didnt get the memo because Vampire the Masquerade 2, Death Stranding and Cyberpunk are using the default regional pricing ($65.99cad) instead of their actual price ($79.99)
 
  • Like
Reactions: lashman and madjoki

madjoki

👀 I see you
Sep 19, 2018
3,022
11,273
113
EGS finally added CAD support but some publishers didnt get the memo because Vampire the Masquerade 2, Death Stranding and Cyberpunk are using the default regional pricing ($65.99cad) instead of their actual price ($79.99)
Well, they probably don't know about other regional prices too, because games are cheaper than on their own stores. :p
Or maybe agreements force them to let EPIC dictate regional prices or something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lashman

lashman

Dead & Forgotten
Sep 5, 2018
30,683
86,403
113
Well, they probably don't know about other regional prices too, because games are cheaper than on their own stores. :p
Or maybe agreements force them to let EPIC dictate regional prices or something.
that might be the case ... doubt 505 would let it slide like that
 

Rosenkrantz

Once Punched Man
Apr 22, 2019
1,020
2,306
113
Checking the Aussie prices for Steam vs. Epic.

  • Darksiders III $2 cheaper on steam
  • Outward the same
  • Subnauticas $1-$2 cheaper on steam
  • Hades $2 cheaper on steam
  • Metro Exodus the same

Hmm... i though the cut would make games cheaper?
Prices would be the same even if Epic only charged 5% tax. Timmy's trickle down has always been a bad excuse.
 

beep boop

MetaMember
Dec 6, 2018
2,170
4,558
113
A revenue-increasing measure leading profit-seeking companies to hold on to any and all gains? Say it ain’t so! Even accepting pie in sky economic concepts like that, the very idea of significantly lower prices for games while developers also earn more has been comically paradoxical since this whole thing got off the ground.
 

lashman

Dead & Forgotten
Sep 5, 2018
30,683
86,403
113
another great post from Rob:


It’s been rather entertaining reading back over the outrageous amounts of noise from when Epic launched their store in a blaze of publicity, more than a year ago.​
Oh, the excitement! Finally Steam has a competitor and competition is important! This could change so much! They’re on the developer’s side! Oh gosh, looks like that 70/30 cut is history! Wahoo!​
So. Given the passing of time, what major changes have Epic launching a store actually brought?​
checks list
Ah. The Epic Store now has a wishlist feature.​
Well. It’s something, I suppose.​
I’m being flippant of course but really, for most people in games, absolutely nothing of use nor ornament changed in any substantial way.​
Valve quickly countered the threat of any bleeding out of big name titles by offering improved terms for the biggest sellers (not an insubstantial adjustment if you consider the scale and regularity of money coming in at the top end these days), for everyone else it’s been business as usual. We make a game, we plop it on Steam or Itch or whichever console is most favourable to letting us on and hopefully we shifts copies. We still have largely a 70/30 standard cut. And, that’s it really.​
If we’re one of the fortunate literal handful that Epic wish to rain money down upon (an unsurprisingly dwindling number) for exclusivity then there’s still a chance of Free MoneyTM. (Where money is, of course, never free but we go through this at least once every few years with something).​
For some of us, Epic continue to give our games away to the public for a brief period of time in exchange for a probably handy small wad of cash and, to be honest, that’s about it. Steam still remain a monopoly, Epic’s store so far remains incredibly bare bones with no sign of any of the more difficult stuff around selling being solved in their corner.​
At the time of launch, my biggest worry was that Epic would “do a Microsoft” and just splash money around breaking more stuff than they fixed. Instead, it’s largely just been a case of a few people got some extra money and that’s about it. Perversely, probably the best outcome anyone could have reasonably expected.​
It turns out that competition existing isn’t enough. There does, also, need to be some actual competing in there as well. Who knew?​
 

Tizoc

Retired, but still Enabling
Oct 11, 2018
7,622
18,766
113
37
Oman
ko-fi.com
Instead of thanking Epic for having Valve become more open with its user base, as well as promoting events like LudoNarrCon and the LGBTQ+ themed event some months ago, we should be looking at Epic Game Store and asking why it isn't doing something similar itself.
 

Arsene

On a break
Apr 17, 2019
3,279
8,303
113
Canada
Instead of thanking Epic for having Valve become more open with its user base, as well as promoting events like LudoNarrCon and the LGBTQ+ themed event some months ago, we should be looking at Epic Game Store and asking why it isn't doing something similar itself.
But having an LGBT+ sale would probably upset Tencent :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: C-Dub and TheTrain

gabbo

MetaMember
Dec 22, 2018
3,512
5,554
113
Toronto
Non the less, themed events like what steam does is great, but all EGS does is 'Mega Sales', devaluing games they said they didn't want to do.
Epic isn't into doing promotion, remember? I'm sure if devs or influencers try, they'll "support it", but EGS itself must remain serious business. Also that'd be way too much work to implement for a weekend. Maybe if you gave them 6 months heads up.
 

lashman

Dead & Forgotten
Sep 5, 2018
30,683
86,403
113
one more good thread from Rob:


So, wrote a bit about how the Epic Store hasn't moved the needle in any sort of substantial way for any of us.

Amazingly, as observant as I can be, without noticing they'd announced how much revenue the store pulled in over the course of the year.

I know you're not supposed to do anything silly like go and check numbers for anything. But even the most brief of glances would put £680M in revenue through the store below Steam circa 2010, before they really went into fully automated money making machine to the point that it's probably a difficult number to conceive by 2020.

It's a big number because I don't actually have any hope of seeing £680M unless there's some weird inflation problem but in terms of making any sort of dint into videogames, it's pretty negligible.

Given by their admissions that 90% of revenue comes from the exclusive titles they've bought - they're neither use nor ornament to anyone not being thrown a wad of money to be on there. Obviously if they were that would be very public knowledge at this point because nobody would be able to shut up about needing to be there.

In short: all mouth, no trousers.

(you can also guarantee that the bulk of that money will be around a couple of titles because that's just how it tends to go)

(Also, also, Spidey sense tingling over the longer term success of Borderlands 3 on Epic given its vaulting to amongst the top sellers on Steam. But sure, Epic gonna sort us out, yeah.)