It depends on the screen size. In the end pixel density is the key factor. 1080p at 22"-24" looks pretty good actually.
Yeah I have a 24" thats 1080p and I love it. I also use a 15" retina so I can be sensitive to resolution.It depends on the screen size. In the end pixel density is the key factor. 1080p at 22"-24" looks pretty good actually.
It depends on the distance between your eyes and the screen really. If you use PC monitor you don't need 4K but if you use TV (that usually quite far away) you'll want 4K.
It depends on the distance between your eyes and the screen really. If you use PC monitor you don't need 4K but if you use TV (that usually quite far away) you'll want 4K.
![]()
I feel like it's the opposite for me.It depends on the distance between your eyes and the screen really. If you use PC monitor you don't need 4K but if you use TV (that usually quite far away) you'll want 4K.
![]()
Would it ruin some kind of immersion or ingame logic to have a map or fuck that, it needs it anyway?
Res talk :
Stop tempting me to buy the AOC 27G2U (1080p/144hz Free/G-Sync monitor, ~240 euros)
Yes 4K is obviously better but is it necessary though. The price of the 4K monitor is really more expensive than 4K TV and the hardware required to do 4K is obviously more expensive as well. That's why a lot of people said that 1440p with high refresh rate is the sweet spot.I really have to disagree. The closer I'm the more beneficial and pleasing 4k looks to me.
Sure screen size plays a factor but saying that 4k is irrelevant if you are close to the screen is wrong.
People even prefer their smartphone screens to be at high resolution and perceive a difference.
Is there a drop off at one point? Certainly. But it's not as simple as this chart makes it out to be.
Training and using a high resolution also is a factor here. Once you get used to a certain pixel density, you'll start noticing differences more easy.
Human brains are amazing at adapting to things: thirty fps is awesome to most people, after getting used to it for years. Let them play at 100+ for one and it will be hard for them to go back.
Yes 4K is obviously better but is it necessary though. The price of the 4K monitor is really more expensive than 4K TV and the hardware required to do 4K is obviously more expensive as well. That's why a lot of people said that 1440p with high refresh rate is the sweet spot.
I recently used a really old 1920x1200 screen (Dell FPW2405 -- holy shit it's 15 years old!) on a secondary PC for a while and it really is a nice aspect ratio for work. Especially 2 monitors with 16:10 each. But for gaming a single 16:9 (or, when supported, 21:9) monitor is much nicer IMHO.I miss 16:10 so much.![]()
I don't know how Xbox can do HDR but Windows PC can't (do it as good)I agree, and the reason why I've chosen 1440p + high, variable refresh rate for my setup.
In contrast to my brother who got himself a very good 27" 4k display. His image looks a lot better, but he plays at ~45fps in many games. Which makes the IQ advantage irrelevant in my opinion.
And while talking about displays, we are not even taking HDR into account. Which still has not arrived on PC in a meaningful way. Which is the real crime imo.
Yeah it depends on your preferences. I have a laptop so 1080p is the max I'd go for with at the very least 60fps if possible. As long as it's a decent framerate, it makes so much difference when playing.I only recently moved my gaming to 1080p, up till now I was playing at 1680x1050. I have a monitor and a TV connected to the PC, the monitor is 1680x1050 so I just set Windows to mirror the image because I was too lazy to properly set up multiple monitors. Framerate is the only thing that matters to me, I don't care about resolution at all.
I don't know how Xbox can do HDR but Windows PC can't
Be like Rockstar and make the Source code for your game such spaghetti that even if you had the original it wouldnt matter anyways if someone found it they wouldnt be able to do shit with it (But they lost the spaghetti anyways, RIP RDR on PC)
As someone who works on photos 16:10 is great! I would even say that Microsoft all in one desktop with 3:2 is pretty much my dream setup for work. For games I would want a ultra wide.I recently used a really old 1920x1200 screen (Dell FPW2405 -- holy shit it's 15 years old!) on a secondary PC for a while and it really is a nice aspect ratio for work. Especially 2 monitors with 16:10 each. But for gaming a single 16:9 (or, when supported, 21:9) monitor is much nicer IMHO.
How do you lose the source code for a 21st century game???
Simple: Don't consider backing up it to begin with.How do you lose the source code for a 21st century game???
Make backing it up as long and painful as every animation in RDR2How do you lose the source code for a 21st century game???
I've been playing all weekend with friends, my god this game is fun.Fall Guys is my shit, loving it. Haven't pre-ordered it, but if the game avoid server issues and other techincal issues and the devs keep it going with content, it can become big.
Sadly no Gamecube titlesI can't hold all these PC ports of Nintendo games![]()
L is real 2401 confirmedI can't hold all these PC ports of Nintendo games![]()
Maybe I will make something and send it to Lego ideas and get it made.....
I think DD is the main one that does timed exclusive for their games and they know that they can do it since the games that they typically publish are big hits that sell a good amount of copies.I still find it funny for some reason how Carrion is console exclusive to Xbox and Switch and Fall Guys is console exclusive to PS4.
You literally need all 3 consoles (PS4, Switch, Xbone now, PS5, Switch, XSX next-gen) if you want as much indie goodness as possible and yet you are missing a ton of indie goodness that's only on PC.
Indies will definetly be moneyhatted left and right by the console companies to delay the release on other consoles while PC being excluded from that timed exclusivity bullshit. Epic still does some of it, but not as much as before and unless they are online only you can still go arrrrr.
And btw, Fall Guys is super fun.
play Max Payne 2 insteadI should play Max Payne 3 again. :thinking:
Obligatory HEALTH post:I should play Max Payne 3 again. :thinking:
The last Airport level is worth itMax Payne 3 was incredibly fun to play, but the constant cutscene interruption makes me never wanna revisit it
My personal hot take is: we as consumers shouldn't care or worry about a company's bottom line. Microsoft shops around for games for their service and if it wasn't a good deal I swear companies wouldn't take it. Take RDR2 for instance. Maybe Microsoft wrote them a big check, more people subscribed to GP, and then spent money on the Online. Everybody wins.So much concern trolling regarding game pass on Twitter, Reddit and so on.
Game pass is great value and it does indeed sell games considering I use game pass as a demo service for what I wanna buy on Steam/PC and if the game is console exclusive (like Kingdom Hearts games) I usually just play the game on game pass. Like I have had KH 2.8 HD sitting in my PSN wishlist since forever, but I have always found the price too high, but now that it is on game pass I plan on playing it there unless a PC version is announced.
I have only heard good things about game pass from indie devs. They get upfront money from MS, lots of people tries the game and if it's good it gives the game more word of mouth, some people then finish it via game pass and others (like me) buys it regardless of where they buy it.
The last Airport level is worth it