Definitely sounds like one aimed at fans.Persona 5 Tactica got pretty middling reviews. I'll likely give it a pass for now and grab a Steam copy on the cheap in the future.
DL Site has an official discord?Japanese adult game platform DLSite forced to block German users
DLSite had no other choice than to forbid German users from purchasing their products.
DLSite began banning German users on November 2nd, as the users were receiving errors when attempting to access their website.
from their discord:
Is this coming to Steam? So far it says "console times exclusive".
If that's the case, what a shame Playism, WSSG, and Ladybug.
I guess their other games just didn't do that well on Steam, or they maybe they did end up selling 3X amounts on eShop vs Steam.
I went ahead and read Tactica spoilers and it's basically Persona Q2 all over again. I was obsessed with Persona 5 back in the day (I bought all the games and spent hundreds of dollars for figures of the party members and Kawakami/Takemi) but Tactica feels like the same old same old. I'm also not particularly excited for Persona 3 Reload as it feels like the devs are just trying to emulate what made Persona 5 great instead of giving it a distinct identity. I hope Persona 6 brings back my passion for the franchise.Definitely sounds like one aimed at fans.
I’ve think I’ll be done with Persona 5 after this. Strikers was good, but I found PQ2 and the rhythm game lacking, so I’m expecting I’ll get through this once and forget about it.
I've grown quite fond of GNOME's Quick Settings, but it's good to see Windows finally making switching audio output better.Hey, a useful new shortcut key in Win 11.
I don't like having to scroll down to see the mixer though when there's still much vertical space left.
Yep, the official english discord isDL Site has an official discord?
Just looking the screenshots I know it's a Team Ladybug game.
Well that for sure, but considering what happened with the Tintin game released by Microids not even a week ago I think some people are fine with getting a Grendizer game that at least works, even if it's low budgetI'm going to guess that even with tempered expectations it starting off with 100% positive rate is mostly because of super nostalgic fans of the old anime series.
WB as a whole is a zombie company. The funny thing is their games division is one of the few bright spots as Zaslav said it has been profitable for 15 consecutive years and Hogwarts made over $1 billion.Can WB just die already? How have they not yet?
I only feel for their workforce. It must be miserable there.
Also, Xbox is not a big platform. Not releasing on Sony platforms is a dumb decision by Microsoft.Starfield being such a dud is not something I honestly expected at all. Like sure I didn't expect the game to be good personally but that's never mattered in the past, their games were always massive and "event" like. But sales were low from what we could tell and as we can see on the circana/NPD charts it dropped from #1 to 14 best seller (biggest drop of anything on their chart month to month) and just before I posted this I checked the steam numbers and they've dipped so low that Witcher 3 is just about to surpass it in CCU.
Combine all this with the game only getting a single nomination at TGA yesterday and it paints a really dire picture. Entering this year starfield was probably the most hyped game next to zelda which makes sense since Bethesda has the 2nd most gotys ever behind Naughty Dog. I guess their game design has just fallen too far behind the rest of the industry and it's finally hurting them.
If Elder Scrolls VI ends up being a "fast travel simulator" like Starfield that one too will be a dud tooIf Starfield was The Elder Scrolls VI or Fallout 5 it would’ve fared better because those worlds and settings just work better with what Bethesda does.
Nah I disagree. PC is and will always be the biggest platform for their games. Remember Skyrim was literally unplayable on PS3, but in the long run all of their games suffer from that issue (its the save file bloat which caused that issue because everything you do is saved and sooner or later the save simply gets too big for a console to read). You can try the game on consoles but only the pc version realizes their potential even outside of moddingAlso, Xbox is not a big platform. Not releasing on Sony platforms is a dumb decision by Microsoft.
I don't disagree that it definitely hurt them compared to past games but even on PC their numbers were dramatically worse than expected. Its max peak CCU was only like 50k more than skyrim and was almost 200k less than Fallout 4 and both of those came out when steam was massively smaller than it is now. I know gamepass is out there but we all know the issues with windows store and how few people want to use it, other gamepass games seem to do very well on steam and surpass their previous entries.Also, Xbox is not a big platform. Not releasing on Sony platforms is a dumb decision by Microsoft.
I don’t disagree with your overall post, but I think my point was that the world of The Elder Scrolls lends itself to not being a fast travel sim for all the reasons you described.If Elder Scrolls VI ends up being a "fast travel simulator" like Starfield that one too will be a dud too
You're preaching to the choir here, no one here will doubt the game (like every game) is best on PC. But I'm saying there's a ton more people who'd buy it if it was available on PS5. It's not 2011 anymore. Sony has a massive lead in the console space over Xbox and games can run pretty much the same on PS5 as on Xbox XNah I disagree. PC is and will always be the biggest platform for their games. Remember Skyrim was literally unplayable on PS3, but in the long run all of their games suffer from that issue (its the save file bloat which caused that issue because everything you do is saved and sooner or later the save simply gets too big for a console to read). You can try the game on consoles but only the pc version realizes their potential even outside of modding
Besides even if it released on ps5 Starfield would have been a dud regardless. Its problems are universal
That's a good point. I guess games like Baldurs Gate 3 just show people that RPGs can be more than simple murder mayhem simulators and have an actual story.I don't disagree that it definitely hurt them compared to past games but even on PC their numbers were dramatically worse than expected. Its max peak CCU was only like 50k more than skyrim and was almost 200k less than Fallout 4 and both of those came out when steam was massively smaller than it is now. I know gamepass is out there but we all know the issues with windows store and how few people want to use it, other gamepass games seem to do very well on steam and surpass their previous entries.
I would say that murder hoboism and story are two wholly different aspects, not mutually exclusive. And that BG3 is very far from the only CRPG with a good story. To me BG3 is above all a masterclass of of choices and consequences, sorta CRPG but what if also ImSim.That's a good point. I guess games like Baldurs Gate 3 just show people that RPGs can be more than simple murder mayhem simulators and have an actual story.
As far as I know steam tells you clearly if a key has been revoked.[HELP]
How do you check if a game is removed from your Steam library?
I've been reading that people are finding some games getting removed if they got from keys and such.
Is Dota 2 dead?
Rocket League being in the top 10 while it hasn't been available on Steam for over 3 years is pretty funny.
WB as a whole is a zombie company. The funny thing is their games division is one of the few bright spots as Zaslav said it has been profitable for 15 consecutive years and Hogwarts made over $1 billion.
If I'm not wrong here[HELP]
How do you check if a game is removed from your Steam library?
I've been reading that people are finding some games getting removed if they got from keys and such.
Just from what little I've seen, AW2 did decent. It didn't exactly light the world on fire, but it found its niche. If it rakes in some GOTY awards that'll give it a sales boost.
Always has been.Is Dota 2 dead?
Also I was promised pragmatic OLED without burnin to have happened at least 15 years ago...The scary part is, people were saying this a decade ago about MicroLED. Soon I'll have been hearing about how MLED is "a decade away" for over two decades lol.
But i think there are some high-end TV's that do use it? They're like greater than 80 inches in size though. It seems the tough part currently is shrinking it down and making it affordable?
We can't be that far away from a MLED monitor... Maybe 5-7 years? IDK, OLED's just don't seem like a great investment as a PC monitor to me. Not only do you have the risk of burn-in from static desktop elements, but also the organic components of OLED degrade over time at a pace greater than traditional LED, etc...
Don't get me wrong, I love how OLED looks especially for HDR applications, but they still scare the shit out of me as someone who has to save up for big purchases and can't just shit out a paycheck or 3 when a big purchase needs to be replaced.
I know I'll probably get the "Well thats not the same thing" but wasn't the Lord of the Rings games from WB jam packed with all of the GaaS stuff everyone hated and they own the patent/trademark for the nemesis system that is most likely being shoved into the Wonder Woman game if anything since that would make the most sense if anything (to me at least)Wonder Woman Game to be Live Service Hints Job Ads as WB Vows to Double Down on GaaS
The live-service model seems to be in decline, but Warner Bros. Discovery and the makers of the new Wonder Woman didn't get the memo.wccftech.com
Avengers was a flop and Suicide Squad is looking like a flop, but the Wonder Woman game will be the superhero live service title that takes off. For real.
Don't you know? ALL the players of Starfield are using GamePass in unprecedented numbers. It is a huge hit! You have to take our word, though, because we won't ever give a real-time overview on how many people play the game on gamepass.Starfield being such a dud is not something I honestly expected at all. Like sure I didn't expect the game to be good personally but that's never mattered in the past, their games were always massive and "event" like. But sales were low from what we could tell and as we can see on the circana/NPD charts it dropped from #1 to 14 best seller (biggest drop of anything on their chart month to month) and just before I posted this I checked the steam numbers and they've dipped so low that Witcher 3 is just about to surpass it in CCU.
Combine all this with the game only getting a single nomination at TGA yesterday and it paints a really dire picture. Entering this year starfield was probably the most hyped game next to zelda which makes sense since Bethesda has the 2nd most gotys ever behind Naughty Dog. I guess their game design has just fallen too far behind the rest of the industry and it's finally hurting them.
The thing is: They THINK they know what their audience want. And coincidentally, that always results in changes that they believe will make them even more money. Why reiterate on a proven formula that will just make the same money as before? We need GROWTH!This is one of the frustrating things about game companies (aside from maybe Nintendo) -- they don't seem to have any understanding of why people like games. The Battlefield franchise is a good example. People wanted more of what made Bad Company 2 outstanding, and none of that has been included in later games, not even a bit. Instead. Battlefield has tried to chase trends or be a COD alternative. Here, we have Bethesda seemingly not understanding what made Skyrim such a legendary success. Why have people played and talked about certain games for literally years, even buying them multiple times? It's a fucking mystery, I guess.
Idk if this is due to suits making decisions, focus group testing, or what, but it's not like it's hard to observe the online communities of gamers to find out exactly what things grab people. It's not like we make it a secret. Don't these companies like money? It would be different if their stupid ideas resulted in huge successes, but from my perspective, the industry has been releasing disappointing flops left and right for a few years now and learning nothing.
For normal media use, we are pretty much at a point where you can use OLED without having to think about it, and have warranties from companies that cover 5 of use (for TVs). For monitors, it's pretty much about whether you feel fine restricting yourself to just media use. Of course it probably depends on what kind of games you are playing. 1000s of hours of DOTA 2 or something like that is likely still a terrible idea for OLED. But if you can avoid stuff with static elements, or the same static element over 100s of hours, then it's probably fine.Also I was promised pragmatic OLED without burnin to have happened at least 15 years ago...
I forgot that the list for for US only.Just from what little I've seen, AW2 did decent. It didn't exactly light the world on fire, but it found its niche. If it rakes in some GOTY awards that'll give it a sales boost.
Always has been.
But seriously, Dota was never a thing in the US. It's always been much bigger in Europe and Asia.