Jedi Survivor 25% off
From $90USD finally at $70 in the region I'm currently in, wow much discount !
From $90USD finally at $70 in the region I'm currently in, wow much discount !
It’s the already underpaid artists that are getting hit here.
the artists that are getting less money or work because a company is using AI artwork in their next mobile game.
Excuse me if im gonna be extremely inflammatory here, but,I'm completely against AI art, artists are already very underappreciated, if AI art was accepted and wasn't receiving hate, it would just result in taking away work opportunities from actual artists.
Anyone that actually cares about art and other types of work that rely on human creativity should, which I guess is something that techbros wouldn't understand.WHO GIVES A FLYING FUCK?
As my wishlist is not loading at all, I think it is safe to say we experience the typical hour or so until the load is lowered enough that all discounts are displayed correctly.So either the discounts are loading up really slowly or more than half the games on my wish list aren't getting discounts lol.
Up to 0%? This means negative discounts?yay let's go
If these works are reliant on human creativity, then the human creativity will retain its value anywaysAnyone that actually cares about art and other types of work that rely on human creativity should, which I guess is something that techbros wouldn't understand.
Oh, you wanted a sale, did you? You will get a second job to afford these games, peasant.Up to 0%? This means negative discounts?
No discounts for the FF Pixel Remasters. Fucking lameSo either the discounts are loading up really slowly or more than half the games on my wish list aren't getting discounts lol.
Honestly, I really think that's a bit snobbish.Anyone that actually cares about art and other types of work that rely on human creativity should, which I guess is something that techbros wouldn't understand.
It's an amazing game!Pizza Tower finally on sale, easy first purchase
"Artists" don't have the monopoly on human creativity or creative work, and yet somehow people in other fields that require ingenuity and creativity have been losing their jobs for literal hundreds of years.Anyone that actually cares about art and other types of work that rely on human creativity should, which I guess is something that techbros wouldn't understand.
to be fair, from what i've seen so far - you all agree with each other you're all arguing the same side, haha yes, even HektorMan y'all act like artists were making the big bucks with their creations and not dependent on tip jars and abusive contracts with their customers
That's not at all the argument.'Things have sucked for everyone else it was about time it was your turn' ain't a great argument lol
Well, I don't consider using AI as 'doing more'. Plus I'm very wary of AI used in stuff like this because it will quite possibly be used to reinforce the status quo, i.e. white supremacy and Western ideals of aesthetics.That's not at all the argument.
The argument is that the problem is not with technological tools that make humans capable of doing more. The problem is when the economic system results in the effect of those tools being negative for some people, despite them improving human productivity as a whole. And that it's myopic at best and selfish at worst to only recognize this when it applies to tools which affect some professions but not others, as if they are better and more deserving of protection.
If AI wasn't, to some extent, enabling people to "do more" in less time then I feel like there wouldn't be as much concern about it.Well, I don't consider using AI as 'doing more'.
A ton of generative AI progress (especially in image generation) is currently coming out of China.Plus I'm very wary of AI used in stuff like this because it will quite possibly be used to reinforce the status quo, i.e. white supremacy and Western ideals of aesthetics.
But is that 'more' good though.If AI wasn't, to some extent, enabling people to "do more" in less time then I feel like there wouldn't be as much concern about it.
I hereby found our Anti AI corner, population: 2This is the last thing I'll post about the AI stuff, for those defending AI replacing activities/work that relies on human creativity, let's say, if AI advanced enough to the point of being close enough to immitating human speech and nuances, would you be accepting of it replacing entertainers, streamers, vtubers and such?
If your response is yes, there's just no way I'm ever going to agree with you.
Seems to include all of it, at a glance.
How much of the DLC is missing from the Season Pass?
It's also annoying how the proliferation of AI art has resulted in some amount of blind hatred for anything with AI. Like the muscle deformation tech in the recent Spiderman games.I personally am not sure if I agree with the intensity of the hate on AI image generation that is common in some parts of the internet. Of course, I also come from a background of already thinking that copyright in general (and copyright by corporations in particular) goes too far, and I fear a further overreach in this particular area.
Obviously the copyright issues will need to be figured out, but (and this is where some people will vehemently disagree or even scream at me) I am not convinced that just because an AI model was trained on a given image (as one in billions) there should be any copyright claim by the author of that image on images generated by the model.
Human artists also look at lots of images and then draw new ones based, among other things, on what they have seen before.
People seem to have this idea that AI image generation works by taking some parts of images wholesale and reproducing them with slight changes, but that's just fundamentally wrong. A very easy way to see this is by noting that the average stable diffusion checkpoint has something like 2 GB of data, while being trained on hundreds of terabytes of images. What I want to illustrate by that is that the impact of any individual image (or even 100s of images) on a given output image is minuscule -- similar to or even less than what could easily happen if an artist had looked at some specific images before working on something new.
Didn't this interview happen way back when the console ports were released?Final Fantasy Pixel Remasters:
Cool, Thanks"
150 Years from now, people will call you a RobophobeThis is the last thing I'll post about the AI stuff, for those defending AI replacing activities/work that relies on human creativity, let's say, if AI advanced enough to the point of being close enough to immitating human speech and nuances, would you be accepting of it replacing entertainers, streamers, vtubers and such?
If your response is yes, there's just no way I'm ever going to agree with you.
what game is this?
You can dual wield Shotguns.
You can do bullet time.
You can do superspeed.
You can dual wield Shotguns!
You can dropkick people.
You can throw people across the map with super strenght.
You can wield two Shotguns at once.
You can dropkick someone so hard against an obstacle that their heads get chopped off.
You can slide around with super speed.
You can kill people utilizing a shotgun in each of your hands.
You can slidekick entire groups of people into the air.
You can kill them with slow-mo mid air afterwards as you are dual wielding shotguns.
You can grab an enemy and throw him into enemies, making them drop like bowling pins.
But most of all.
You can dual wield shotguns.
what game is this?
It usually happens a couple of days before the new bundle is released, so maybe sunday or monday.How come no humble bumble monthly leak yet?
Oh right, heard a lot of positive comparisons with FEAR for that one. Will have to give that a try at some point.
it's seriously GREAT!Oh right, heard a lot of positive comparisons with FEAR for that one. Will have to give that a try at some point.