There's more countries besides the US?Mother's day is on a whole bunch of different dates for a whole bunch of countries
There's more countries besides the US?Mother's day is on a whole bunch of different dates for a whole bunch of countries
Disney has games on Steam it would be weird if they were the problem.Noelopan once said: Never ascribe to incompetence that which is adequately explained by malice.
Wouldn't be surprised if it is some strange Disney requirement.
Zodiac is just a great movie. It's my favorite M.Night movie.There's more countries besides the US?
Isn't that Fincher?Zodiac is just a great movie. It's my favorite M.Night movie.
That gif is from Source Code.Zodiac is just a great movie. It's my favorite M.Night movie.
I still think KH could simply be a 2 year exclusivity like Oddworld Soulstorm. Remember Epic made a big deal of the KH announcement (even if the actual stream sucked)Noelopan once said: Never ascribe to incompetence that which is adequately explained by malice.
Wouldn't be surprised if it is some strange Disney requirement.
Thanks, I see they have it for 43.5 eur, not great but certainly better than 60.cdkeys
I just checked it, never heard of them but yeah apparently they are authorized, unlike cdkeys?Anyone here use etail.market?
Pretty much the only reason this stream happened was KH, so yeah, that one definitively feels like it has a bigger deal than the rest. We shall see thoI still think KH could simply be a 2 year exclusivity like Oddworld Soulstorm. Remember Epic made a big deal of the KH announcement (even if the actual stream sucked)
Never forget:
It's not the successful GaaS that's taking the place of the third entry in a failed series though."Why do people hate on live service games I don't understand why can't other devs have a shot at making one..."
Respawn opens third studio to keep Apex Legends going for '10 to 15 years'
The ongoing popularity of Apex Legends has caused Respawn to open its third studio, the company has announced. Original…www.gamesindustry.biz
Ask a titanfall fan why.
They just cancelled a titanfall/apex SP game in february in order to double down on Apex itself, this move here confirms that. People don't need to fear bad live service games like anthem or avengers they need to worry about their favorite devs getting it right and being stuck with it forever.It's not the successful GaaS that's taking the place of the third entry in a failed series though.
With APEX, there's even a chance that it could happen one day. Which certainly wouldn't be the case otherwise.
my attempt at a joke. Since all 3 are not the same movie.That gif is from Source Code.
"Why do people hate on live service games I don't understand why can't other devs have a shot at making one..."
Respawn opens third studio to keep Apex Legends going for '10 to 15 years'
The ongoing popularity of Apex Legends has caused Respawn to open its third studio, the company has announced. Original…www.gamesindustry.biz
Ask a titanfall fan why.
It's not the successful GaaS that's taking the place of the third entry in a failed series though.
With APEX, there's even a chance that it could happen one day. Which certainly wouldn't be the case otherwise.
If Apex had failed after lackluster Titanfall 1 and 2, chances are, that Respawn would have been spawn camped and killed by EA.They just cancelled a titanfall/apex SP game in february in order to double down on Apex itself, this move here confirms that. People don't need to fear bad live service games like anthem or avengers they need to worry about their favorite devs getting it right and being stuck with it forever.
EA Kills In-Development Mash-Up Of Titanfall And Apex Legends (kotaku.com)
I think that's a bit too absolute. It's certainly true the vast majority of the time, but what about Half Life?And let's be honest, for Shooters, the single-player campaign or experience was never the pull for the games in gaming history. It was always the Multiplayer that made legends out of single-player Shooters.
Is it? It spawned Counterstrike.I think that's a bit too absolute. It's certainly true the vast majority of the time, but what about Half Life?
There are also a lot more examples of more middling popularity, but I think HL is the standout counter-example.
No. Game bugs are not going to break graphics cards.implies that the issue has to do with Diablo IV
When something similar happened with New World, the cause was apparently a flaw in some EVGA 3090 models.No. Game bugs are not going to break graphics cards.
Literally impossible, because there's (should at least be) working hardware level protections.
Gonna hard disagree on this one. The original shooters like Wolfenstein and DOOM were popular specifically for their single player. And now the same with their modern counterparts with Wolfenstein: TNO/TNC, DOOM 2016, Eternal, etc. in addition to the Half-life series. I don't really agree that HL2 wouldn't exist without the original CS but even if that were accurate, MP is NOT what HL2 was popular our bought for. Far Cry series as well, and other shooters that sometimes may have co-op but still are largely played solo like Borderlands, and then all the "indie" shooters like Amid Evil, Turbo Overkill, Severed, HROT, DUSK, and more. All reasonably to extremely successful.If Apex had failed after lackluster Titanfall 1 and 2, chances are, that Respawn would have been spawn camped and killed by EA.
And let's be honest, for Shooters, the single-player campaign or experience was never the pull for the games in gaming history. It was always the Multiplayer that made legends out of single-player Shooters. And those multiplayer experiences survived either by gameplay or support.
You misunderstand something.Gonna hard disagree on this one. The original shooters like Wolfenstein and DOOM were popular specifically for their single player. And now the same with their modern counterparts with Wolfenstein: TNO/TNC, DOOM 2016, Eternal, etc. in addition to the Half-life series. I don't really agree that HL2 wouldn't exist without the original CS but even if that were accurate, MP is NOT what HL2 was popular our bought for. Far Cry series as well, and other shooters that sometimes may have co-op but still are largely played solo like Borderlands, and then all the "indie" shooters like Amid Evil, Turbo Overkill, Severed, HROT, DUSK, and more. All reasonably to extremely successful.
It's also impossible to know, but there are a non-trivial amount of people who bought games who are known for their MP just for the SP experience, like Halo and CoD. I wouldn't suggest those devs double down on the SP focus of course, it's a minority, but it's one big enough for even the greedy-ass Actiblizz to keep dumping millions of dollars into the SP campaign year after year.
Of the shooters I can think of, more are known for their single player content than are known for their multiplayer content even if you stick to the biggest names and releases. CoD/Halo/Quake are indeed huge in the shooter history/culture, and have dominated certain populations of players at their own times, but maybe because they dominate they're actually the minority of shooters like that. Most MP-only shooters released in the past 5 years have all limped out of launch and then been shuttered quickly.
And without Counterstrike, Valve would have made a multiplayer mode for HL2.
As far as I know, Doom 2016 and Eternal were played primarily for their single player part.Games with a single player campaign plus multiplayer are still defined by their multiplayer part. All of the big series you mentioned are legendary because of the multiplayer.
A lot of the games I mentioned DO have MP modes, they just weren't a significant attraction or population to make people think of the games in that way, they were SP first and that's what people wanted. DOOM and Wolfenstein (the new ones, as well as the originals) are massive sellers - even the less popular sequels made boatloads of money and people use them as comparison points all over reviews and discussions for other games. Also, single-player-only- juggernaut doesn't really make sense, because there's no way for a SP game to dominate the market because they have a finite playtime for most people, which is why there are tons of popular successful SP shooter games, whereas only a very few successful MP shooter games.You misunderstand something.
It is not about multiplayer-only shooters. It's about single-player-only shooters.
Games with a single player campaign plus multiplayer are still defined by their multiplayer part. All of the big series you mentioned are legendary because of the multiplayer.
And I didn't say that HL2 wouldn't exist without counterstrike. I said that the HL series would probably not be that legendary without Counterstrike. And without Counterstrike, Valve would have made a multiplayer mode for HL2.
I am no expert in shooters, are there any single-player-only juggernaut shooters?
Talk about a blast from the past! I played this about 10 years ago perhaps? Freeware at the time.
might be free on steam as well, we'll seeTalk about a blast from the past! I played this about 10 years ago perhaps? Freeware at the time.
For some reason, they have decided to limit pre-orders to EGS even though the Early Access period launches on the same date on Steam. Bizarre.
dam you, Tim!For some reason, they have decided to limit pre-orders to EGS even though the Early Access period launches on same date on Steam. Bizarre.
For some reason, they have decided to limit pre-orders to EGS even though the Early Access period launches on same date on Steam. Bizarre.
I thought this was some meta game for Steam sales.Talk about a blast from the past! I played this about 10 years ago perhaps? Freeware at the time.
Depends how much you have to spend. For years my wife and I have had a PC that runs all our media and that's just sat next to the TV. We recently upgraded to the 6800H version of this: ASUS ExpertCenter PN53|Mini PCs|ASUS Global We put that together with 3 external hard drives (2 8tb and 1 6tb WD Elements external drives) that are always plugged in, and hook it up to the 4k HDR TV.6tb HDD are relatively affordable. But to put on what ? A NAS ? My PC ? Another PC ?
Please carry on, this is my topic of the day.
I would really like something always on that can backup in raid mode and serve my media on TV/Ipad. But it adds up fast every way I look.
On the other hand I did some archeology and I have some old HDD that lives by some fucking miracles, not really tempted to test fate.
Oh, that's cute. Probably the most adorable thing I read this month.So, yes, it does add up. But we hoard a lot of media (books/comics/music is probably 1.8tb alone (so backed up is about 3.6tb of space total), before we get to TV and Film), so it can be cheaper if you have less.