Well you're not responsible for buying everything because you agree with the message if you dislike the actual product. Dustborn doesn't look like my thing and it would be just as any other flop something to pass over, I don't see why certain folks have to claim it failed because of its messaging or whatever they, without playing it either, want to push as their own agenda just as they wanna claim Stellar Blade succeeded because of its messaging too and somehow they pit them against each other when one is a mainstream action game and the other a more potentially niche offering (sounds visual novel-ish to me and I don't play such). Just some loudmouth pieces of shit online wanna make success and failure of everything fit their narrative nowadays. Like Concord would have been an amazingly successful GAAS if only it had replaced all its minority characters (or whatever folks hated?) with hot chicks or something, lol. So dumb.
Again, folks don't even know what they hate, like Sweet Baby, where they probably play (or hear about and go on message boards to rant regardless) various games they were involved in and so just arbitrarily decide how much they actually offered to the end product by how much they liked it and somehow believe this made up fantasy they're building is actual fact or something. I'd say confirmation bias and stuff but that's beyond that and into seek therapy tier.
Like oh you brought up some argument to something I said earlier but I cba so I'll mention this one game nobody else mentioned and go hahahahahaha it didn't sell to your face, that's totally enough to shut your arguments down and I'll mock you and not engage further. Very healthy approach indeed
Of course since I know the "type" sales totally don't prove better quality/superiority when it comes to other things like say, Wii or Switch vs their contemporary competitors, they too also only matter when they fit the chosen narrative and otherwise are meaningless/have (made up) reasons to not count this time.
Last edited:
