The conclusion of Canard PC's test of CP2077:
That is 8/10 because of the bugs.
That is 8/10 because of the bugs.
Yeah, the bugs have been the main reason for points being docked off.The conclusion of Canard PC's test of CP2077:
That is 8/10 because of the bugs.
I would say RTX on is superior in fidelity but the game was clearly art directed without raytracing in mind. They haven't lit it, haven't built those environments with those capabilities in mind and I doubt the art process itself involved RTX in any degree other than late in development.RT on/off screenshots. RT off looks better to me lol.
10GB update downloading in GOG Galaxy at the moment.
Do i sleep tonight or give Cyberpunk a whirl at midnight? Decisions, decisions... hmmm.
Do it10GB update downloading in GOG Galaxy at the moment.
Do i sleep tonight or give Cyberpunk a whirl at midnight? Decisions, decisions... hmmm.
there isn't oneWhere is the option to disable Antialiasing in CP2077?
My thoughts exactly, and I've only played like, an hour! The lighting, the art direction, the writing, everything from the scale to the music and the way every environment is set up. It's insane. Haven't gotten to your point yet though!The game perfectly captures the genre aesthetics.
Yeah turn those off and maybe try Nvidia sharpening.Game looks phenomenal. Maybe a bit too soft at 1440p. I should probably turn off Chromatic Abomination, film grain too if i want a sharper image.
What settings are you running? I did not get a very good experience with the default settings, despite gsync and a 3090. DLSS made the game look very low resolution, but the performance was awful without it. I started with the corporate background, which may have affected the performance due to starting in the middle of the city (in a skyscraper)I'm officially loving the shit out of this game so far. ~5 hours in and I haven't been in a single gunfight outside the tutorial.
I'm running 3440x1440, Ultra everything including raytracing, with auto DLSS, and I get between 60 and 80 FPS (and very consistent frametimes).What settings are you running? I did not get a very good experience with the default settings, despite gsync and a 3090. DLSS made the game look very low resolution, but the performance was awful without it. I started with the corporate background, which may have affected the performance due to starting in the middle of the city (in a skyscraper)
Absolutely not just you. It's like a huge open world Deus Ex, which is one reason I like it so much.Not sure if it's just me, but the game gives a lot of Deus Ex vibes from the early sequences.
I feel like you could do some of the raytracing features, if you use heavier DLSS. But it really depends on whether you'd consider that a worthwhile tradeoff at that performance level. It also depends on the framerate you target -- IMHO, if you're playing with a mouse and targeting 60 FPS, then I probably wouldn't use raytracing in the game on that hardware and instead focus on higher fidelity elsewhere.So everybody confirms that with a 2060S I can do 1440p but RTX is a no go, even with DLSS ?
it's an either/or on nvidia too ... if you turn on the AMD stuff, DLSS gets automatically turned offNext to DLSS in the settings, there are 2 lines about "AMD FidelityFX CAS".
Is it worth activating if one already uses DLSS? Or is it targeted at people who cannot use DLSS because they have an AMD card?
And the film grain.It's not the sharpest image around, but I really don't mind. I think it fits the aesthetics of the game. I even kept the over-the-top chromatic aberration on (which I generally never do) because I feel like it makes the whole thing more 80s-Cyberpunk-ish.
1.4 GB for me and a few others, weird.Just got a 3.5GB update on STEAM
How many cores is in that?How CPU heavy is the game? I've got a ryzen 5 1600@3.7Ghz and an RTX 2060, I want to target 60 fps at 1920x1080, do you think it's doable?